Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;40(8):1033-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1102-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method

Affiliations

A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method

Guen Young Lee et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Aug;40(8):1127. Guen, Young Lee [corrected to Lee, Guen Young]; Joon, Woo Lee [corrected to Lee, Joon Woo]; Hee, Seok Choi [corrected to Choi, Hee Seok]; Kyoung-Jin, Oh [corrected to Oh, Kyoung-Jin]; Heung, Sik Kang [corrected to Kang, Heung Sik]

Abstract

Objective: To introduce a new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis, evaluate its reliabilities, and compare it to the cross-sectional area and anterior-posterior diameter of the dural sac.

Materials and methods: Lumbar central canal stenosis is defined as obliteration of the anterior CSF space in front of the cauda equina. Four musculoskeletal radiologists independently graded lumbar central canal stenosis by this new grading system based on separation degree of the cauda equina on T2-weighted axial images (grade 0 = no lumbar stenosis without obliteration of anterior CSF space; grade 1 = mild stenosis with separation of all cauda equina; grade 2 = moderate stenosis with some cauda equina aggregated; and grade 3 = severe stenosis with none of the cauda equina separated) in 81 patients to determine inter- and intra-reader reliability. One radiologist measured cross-sectional areas and anterior-posterior diameters and compared these to lumbar central canal stenosis grades.

Results: Inter-reader reliabilities were substantial to almost perfect (ICC reliability = 0.730-0.953). Intra-reader reliability was almost perfect (kappa value = 0.863-0.900). Cross-sectional areas and anterior-posterior diameters were different according to grades at all levels (p = 0.000-0.049), except between grades 2 and 3 of L2-3. At L5-S1, only anterior-posterior diameter was different between grades 0 and 1 (p = 0.005) and between grades 0 and 2 (p = 0.022).

Conclusions: This new grading system may be helpful to clinicians for simple and practical evaluation of lumbar central canal stenosis and for communicating with each other.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;11(1):13-26 - PubMed
    1. J Spinal Disord. 1994 Oct;7(5):388-93 - PubMed
    1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Dec;21(8):569-74 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):1423-8; discussion 1429 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Sep;72(8):1178-84 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources