Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Jun;26(6):747-53.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1138-3. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program

Luca Gianotti et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: It is generally believed that resumption of feeding after colorectal resection is indicated only after recovery of bowel function. This study was designed to verify safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral postoperative feeding (EOF) outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

Materials and methods: One hundred patient candidates to elective colorectal resection were prospectively enrolled in an EOF program. Feeding was started on postoperative day (POD) 1 with oral nutritional supplement (ONS). On POD 2, patients had normal food plus ONS to reach 1,000-1,200 kcal/day with progressive increase until 1,800-2,000 kcal/day. Results were compared with historical controls (n = 100) in whom oral feeding was allowed only after full bowel function recovery. The ERAS program was not applied in both groups.

Results: The EOF group had a better recovery of short half-life protein synthesis compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Stool canalization occurred after a median of 3 days (range, 1-6 days) in the EOF group versus 5 days (range, 2-8 days) in the control group (P = 0.001). The feeding protocol was completed in 89 patients within POD 5. Tolerance to resumption of feeding was similar in the two groups. The overall rate of postoperative complication was 22% in the EOF group vs. 27% in the control group (P = 0.51). The median length of hospitalization was 9 days (range, 6-25 days) in the EOF group vs. 12 days (range, 6-31 days) in controls (P = 0.01).

Conclusions: EOF after colorectal operations is feasible and safe outside an ERAS program.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):618-24 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):684-90 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1420-1 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2003 Feb;138(2):206-14 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2005 Nov;92(11):1354-62 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources