Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;189(4):988-998.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03620.x.

Global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle changes after the last ice age

I C Prentice  1   2 , S P Harrison  1   3 , P J Bartlein  4
Affiliations
Free article

Global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle changes after the last ice age

I C Prentice et al. New Phytol. 2011 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

• In current models, the ecophysiological effects of CO₂ create both woody thickening and terrestrial carbon uptake, as observed now, and forest cover and terrestrial carbon storage increases that took place after the last glacial maximum (LGM). Here, we aimed to assess the realism of modelled vegetation and carbon storage changes between LGM and the pre-industrial Holocene (PIH). • We applied Land Processes and eXchanges (LPX), a dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM), with lowered CO₂ and LGM climate anomalies from the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP II), and compared the model results with palaeodata. • Modelled global gross primary production was reduced by 27-36% and carbon storage by 550-694 Pg C compared with PIH. Comparable reductions have been estimated from stable isotopes. The modelled areal reduction of forests is broadly consistent with pollen records. Despite reduced productivity and biomass, tropical forests accounted for a greater proportion of modelled land carbon storage at LGM (28-32%) than at PIH (25%). • The agreement between palaeodata and model results for LGM is consistent with the hypothesis that the ecophysiological effects of CO₂ influence tree-grass competition and vegetation productivity, and suggests that these effects are also at work today.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abe-Ouchi A, Harrison SP. 2009. Constraining the carbon-cycle feedback using palaeodata: the PalaeoCarbon Modelling Intercomparison Project. EOS. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 90: 140.
    1. Abramowitz G. 2005. Towards a benchmark for land surface models. Geophysical Research Letters 32: L22702.
    1. Archer S, Schimel DS, Holland EA. 1995. Mechanisms of shrubland expansion: land use, climate or CO2? Climatic Change 29: 91-99.
    1. Bender M, Sowers T, Labeyrie L. 1994. The Dole effect and its variations during the last 130,000 years as measured in the Vostok ice core. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 8: 363-376.
    1. Bigelow NH, Brubaker LB, Edwards ME, Harrison SP, Prentice IC, Anderson PM, Andreev AA, Bartlein PJ, Christensen TR, Cramer W et al. 2003. Climate change and Arctic ecosystems 1. Vegetation changes north of 55°N between the last glacial maximum, mid-Holocene, and present. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: 8170.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources