Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;96(11):1008-13.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.191882. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

Prevalence of wasting among under 6-month-old infants in developing countries and implications of new case definitions using WHO growth standards: a secondary data analysis

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Prevalence of wasting among under 6-month-old infants in developing countries and implications of new case definitions using WHO growth standards: a secondary data analysis

Marko Kerac et al. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Nov.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: To determine wasting prevalence among infants aged under 6 months and describe the effects of new case definitions based on WHO growth standards.

Design: Secondary data analysis of demographic and health survey datasets.

Setting: 21 developing countries.

Population: 15 534 infants under 6 months and 147 694 children aged 6 to under 60 months (median 5072 individuals/country, range 1710-45 398). Wasting was defined as weight-for-height z-score <-2, moderate wasting as -3 to <-2 z-scores, severe wasting as z-score <-3.

Results: Using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth references, the nationwide prevalence of wasting in infant under-6-month ranges from 1.1% to 15% (median 3.7%, IQR 1.8-6.5%; ∼3 million wasted infants <6 months worldwide). Prevalence is more than doubled using WHO standards: 2.0-34% (median 15%, IQR 6.2-17%; ∼8.5 million wasted infants <6 months worldwide). Prevalence differences using WHO standards are more marked for infants under 6 months than children, with the greatest increase being for severe wasting (indicated by a regression line slope of 3.5 for infants <6 months vs 1.7 for children). Moderate infant-6-month wasting is also greater using WHO, whereas moderate child wasting is 0.9 times the NCHS prevalence.

Conclusions: Whether defined by NCHS references or WHO standards, wasting among infants under 6 months is prevalent in many of the developing countries examined in this study. Use of WHO standards to define wasting results in a greater disease burden, particularly for severe wasting. Policy makers, programme managers and clinicians in child health and nutrition programmes should consider resource and risk/benefit implications of changing case definitions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Country prevalence of wasting (<−2 weight-for-height z-score) as defined by National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth references (striped) and WHO growth standards (shaded). Countries are ordered by increasing infant under-6-month wasting prevalence (NCHS). Boxed comments (ie, ‘Famine’, ‘Humanitarian emergency’) refer to the ‘integrated food security phase classification, IPC’ – see Methods section. (A) Wasting prevalence among infants aged from 0 to under 6 months. (B) Wasting prevalence among children aged from 6 to under 60 months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot of country prevalence of (A) severe and (B) moderate wasting (weight-for-height z-score <−3 and ≥−3 to <−2 respectively), as diagnosed using either National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) or WHO growth norms. Regression and identity lines are shown. Each country survey is represented by one filled and one unfilled circle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Difference in WHO and National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) −2 and −3 z-score cut-offs. Arrows on the figure show median length/height at different ages for boys (using WHO growth standards).

References

    1. Manary MJ, Sandige HL. Management of acute moderate and severe childhood malnutrition. BMJ 2008;337:a2180. - PubMed
    1. Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet 2008;371:340–57 - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition. A joint statement by the World Health Organization, the World Food Programme, the United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition and the United Nations Children's Fund, 2007. [(accessed 19 September 2010)]. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/statement_commbased_malnutrition/en/...
    1. Emergency Nutrition Network, UCL Centre for International Health and Development, Action Contre la Faim. Management of Acute Malnutrition in Infants (MAMI) project, 2009. [(accessed 19 Sept 2010)]. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd/research/nutrition/mami
    1. de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, et al. WHO child growth standards. Acta Paediatr 2006;Issue supplement S450;7

Publication types

MeSH terms