Prevalence of wasting among under 6-month-old infants in developing countries and implications of new case definitions using WHO growth standards: a secondary data analysis
- PMID: 21288999
- PMCID: PMC3195296
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.191882
Prevalence of wasting among under 6-month-old infants in developing countries and implications of new case definitions using WHO growth standards: a secondary data analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To determine wasting prevalence among infants aged under 6 months and describe the effects of new case definitions based on WHO growth standards.
Design: Secondary data analysis of demographic and health survey datasets.
Setting: 21 developing countries.
Population: 15 534 infants under 6 months and 147 694 children aged 6 to under 60 months (median 5072 individuals/country, range 1710-45 398). Wasting was defined as weight-for-height z-score <-2, moderate wasting as -3 to <-2 z-scores, severe wasting as z-score <-3.
Results: Using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth references, the nationwide prevalence of wasting in infant under-6-month ranges from 1.1% to 15% (median 3.7%, IQR 1.8-6.5%; ∼3 million wasted infants <6 months worldwide). Prevalence is more than doubled using WHO standards: 2.0-34% (median 15%, IQR 6.2-17%; ∼8.5 million wasted infants <6 months worldwide). Prevalence differences using WHO standards are more marked for infants under 6 months than children, with the greatest increase being for severe wasting (indicated by a regression line slope of 3.5 for infants <6 months vs 1.7 for children). Moderate infant-6-month wasting is also greater using WHO, whereas moderate child wasting is 0.9 times the NCHS prevalence.
Conclusions: Whether defined by NCHS references or WHO standards, wasting among infants under 6 months is prevalent in many of the developing countries examined in this study. Use of WHO standards to define wasting results in a greater disease burden, particularly for severe wasting. Policy makers, programme managers and clinicians in child health and nutrition programmes should consider resource and risk/benefit implications of changing case definitions.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



References
-
- Manary MJ, Sandige HL. Management of acute moderate and severe childhood malnutrition. BMJ 2008;337:a2180. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition. A joint statement by the World Health Organization, the World Food Programme, the United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition and the United Nations Children's Fund, 2007. [(accessed 19 September 2010)]. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/statement_commbased_malnutrition/en/...
-
- Emergency Nutrition Network, UCL Centre for International Health and Development, Action Contre la Faim. Management of Acute Malnutrition in Infants (MAMI) project, 2009. [(accessed 19 Sept 2010)]. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd/research/nutrition/mami
-
- de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, et al. WHO child growth standards. Acta Paediatr 2006;Issue supplement S450;7
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical