Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;87(1):100-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

The role of context in risky choice

Affiliations

The role of context in risky choice

Stephen F Meyer et al. Behav Processes. 2011 May.

Abstract

Human choice behavior was assessed in a concurrent-chain schedule, where two equal initial links (IL) each led to a distinct terminal-link (TL). One TL was associated with a fixed ratio schedule of reinforcement, while the other was associated with a bi-valued mixed ratio schedule of reinforcement, whose arithmetic mean equaled the Fixed TL schedule. The fixed component (FR50; FR25; FR5) was arranged to be equal to the alternative mixed component in each condition (FR1/99; FR1/49; FR1/9), and choice behavior was measured by proportion of responses to each IL. In addition, the IL duration varied across conditions (VI 30s; VI 15s; FI 1s). Preference for the mixed option was observed with longer durations (e.g., when IL=VI 30s and TL=FR1/99). Participants were relatively indifferent in other conditions, though the results suggested a monotonic increase in preference as either durations or programmed efforts increased. It is concluded that both choice and the conditioned reinforcement value of the mixed option is contextually based, so that the value of a stimulus correlated with an immediate reward (i.e., FR 1) is enhanced the greater the temporal context in which the FR1 is embedded.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A diagram representing the concurrent chains procedure used for the experiment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proportion of responses to the initial link associated with the mixed ratio terminal link across the last 25 trials, holding the initial link constant at VI30s and varying the terminal link values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The proportion of responses to the initial link associated with the mixed ratio terminal link across the last 25 trials, holding the initial link constant at FI1s and varying the terminal link values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The proportion of responses to the initial link associated with the mixed ratio terminal link across the last 25 trials, varying the initial link duration and holding the terminal links constant at FR50 while the mixed option was FR1 and FR99.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cicerone RA. Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1976;25(2):257–261. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fantino E. Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1967;10:35–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fantino E. Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1969;12:723–730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fantino E. Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In: Honig WK, Staddon JER, editors. Handbook of operant behavior. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1977. pp. 313–339.
    1. Fantino E. Context: A central concept. Behavioural Processes. Special Issue: The longer view: 20th century quantitative analyses of behavior. 2001;54:95–110. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources