Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb;84(2):255-60.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0155.

Randomized controlled clinical trial to access efficacy and safety of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Manaus, Brazil

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized controlled clinical trial to access efficacy and safety of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Manaus, Brazil

Anette Chrusciak-Talhari et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Miltefosine has been used in the treatment of several new world cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) species with variable efficacy. Our study is the first evidence on its clinical efficacy in Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis. In this phase II/III randomized clinical trial, 90 CL patients were randomly allocated (2:1) to oral miltefosine (2.5 mg/kg/day/28 days) (N = 60) or parenteral antimony (15-20 mg/Sb/kg/day/20 days) (N = 30) according to age groups: 2-12 y/o and 13-65 y/o. Patients were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) noninfected parasitological proven CL without previous treatment. Definitive cure was accessed at 6 months follow-up visit. No severe adverse events occurred. Vomiting was the most frequent adverse event (48.3%) followed by nausea (8.6%) and diarrhea (6.7%). Cure rates were 71.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 57.8-82.7) and 53.6% (95% CI = 33.9-72.5) (P = 0.05) for miltefosine and antimonial, respectively. There were no differences in cure rates between age groups within the same treatment arms. Miltefosine was safe and relatively well tolerated and cure rate was higher than antimony.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relapse in a patient with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) treated with miltefosine (A), classified intially as apparent cure with complete lesion epithelialization (B) but relapse at the second month follow-up visit – recidiva cutis (C and D). Note the nodular lesions in C and D.

References

    1. Grimaldi G, Jr, Momen H, Naiff RD, McMahon-Pratt D. Characterization and classification of leishmanial parasites from humans, wild mammals, and sand flies in the Amazon region of Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;44:645–661. - PubMed
    1. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Silveira FT, de Souza AA, Braga RR, Ishikawa EA. The dermal leishmaniases of Brazil, with special reference to the ecoepidemiology of the disease in Amazonia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1994;89:435–443. - PubMed
    1. Ministério da Saúde, Fundação Nacional de Saúde, Centro Nacional de Epidemiologia. Manual de Vigilância da Leishmaniose Tegumentar Americana. Second edition. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2007. http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/manual_lta_2ed.pdf (Brazil) Available at. Accessed May 11, 2010.
    1. Sundar S, Jha TK, Thakur CP, Bhattacharya SK, Rai M. Oral miltefosine for the treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100((Suppl 1)):S26–S33. - PubMed
    1. Soto J, Berman J. Treatment of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100((Suppl 1)):S34–40. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms