Age-matching improves the results of renal transplantation with older donors
- PMID: 2129355
- DOI: 10.1093/ndt/5.9.808
Age-matching improves the results of renal transplantation with older donors
Abstract
Whilst HLA matching is routine for renal transplantation, the possible benefits of matching donor and recipient age have not been previously examined. In this study we examined the simultaneous effect of donor to recipient age difference on the graft survival of 141 consecutive first cadaver transplant recipients treated by cyclosporin immunosuppression. Multivariate regression analysis, taking into account other variables of moderately matched recipients (i.e. dialysis time and type, donor/recipient sex, local/imported kidneys, recent sensitivity, total ischaemic time, preoperative transfusions), indicated that age-difference was the single most important variable (P less than 0.05). Individually there was no significant effect of recipient age, whilst older donors (aged greater than 50 years) were associated with significantly worse graft survival than those younger (P less than 0.01). When dealing with donors aged greater than or equal to 50 years the corresponding recipient 1-year graft was improved when the donor was no more than 5 years older than the transplant recipient. Donor age to recipient age difference is a potentially important selection criterion in renal transplantation.
Comment in
-
Age-matching does not improve the results of renal transplantation with older donors.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991;6(8):599-600. doi: 10.1093/ndt/6.8.599. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991. PMID: 1956562 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Donor-recipient age difference--an independent risk factor in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients.Transpl Int. 1991 Jun;4(2):88-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00336403. Transpl Int. 1991. PMID: 1910435
-
The UNOS renal transplant registry.Clin Transpl. 2001:1-18. Clin Transpl. 2001. PMID: 12211771
-
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.Clin Transpl. 1999:1-21. Clin Transpl. 1999. PMID: 11038622
-
Annual trends and triple therapy--1991-2000.Clin Transpl. 2001:247-69. Clin Transpl. 2001. PMID: 12211788
-
The influence of age on outcome after renal transplantation.Geriatr Nephrol Urol. 1997;7(3):137-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1008263727499. Geriatr Nephrol Urol. 1997. PMID: 9493035 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhanced significance of donor-recipient age gradient as a prognostic factor of graft outcome in living donor kidney transplantation.World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1718-26. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2038-1. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23571866
-
Renal transplantation in the elderly.Int Urol Nephrol. 2000;32(2):193-201. doi: 10.1023/a:1007122322571. Int Urol Nephrol. 2000. PMID: 11229632 Review.
-
Optimizing the Use of Deceased Donor Kidneys at Risk of Discard: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Transpl Int. 2025 Jun 26;38:14596. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.14596. eCollection 2025. Transpl Int. 2025. PMID: 40641669 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials