Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;11(5):479-85.

Quality improvement practices in academic emergency medicine: perspectives from the chairs

Jami Dellifraine  1 , James Langabeer, Brent King
Affiliations

Quality improvement practices in academic emergency medicine: perspectives from the chairs

Jami Dellifraine et al. West J Emerg Med. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess academic emergency medicine (EM) chairs' perceptions of quality improvement (QI) training programs.

Methods: A voluntary anonymous 20 item survey was distributed to a sample of academic chairs of EM through the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine. Data was collected to assess the percentage of academic emergency physicians who had received QI training, the type of training they received, their perception of the impact of this training on behavior, practice and outcomes, and any perceived barriers to implementing QI programs in the emergency department.

Results: The response rate to the survey was 69% (N = 59). 59.3% of respondents report that their hospital has a formal QI program for physicians. Chairs received training in a variety of QI programs. The type of QI program used by respondents was perceived as having no impact on goals achieved by QI (χ(2) = 12.382; p = 0.260), but there was a statistically significant (χ(2) = 14.383; p = 0.006) relationship between whether or not goals were achieved and academic EM chairs' perceptions about return on investment for QI training. Only 22% of chairs responded that they have already made changes as a result of the QI training. 78.8% of EM chairs responded that quality programs could have a significant positive impact on their practice and the healthcare industry. Chairs perceived that QI programs had the most potential value in the areas of understanding and reducing medical errors and improving patient flow and throughput. Other areas of potential value of QI include improving specific clinical indicators and standardizing physician care.

Conclusion: Academic EM chairs perceived that QI programs were an effective way to drive needed improvements. The results suggest that there is a high level of interest in QI but a low level of adoption of training and implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Type of quality improvement program used at the hospitals of academic emergency medicine chairs. PDCA, plan, do, check, act
Figure 2
Figure 2
Academic emergency medicine chairs plans to make changes to their behavior and practice based on the quality improvement training received.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Croskerry P, Sinclair D. Emergency medicine: a practice prone to error? J Can Assoc Emerg Physicians. 2001;3(4):271–276. - PubMed
    1. McCaig LF, Burt CW. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 358. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 2005. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2003 emergency department summary. - PubMed
    1. Graff L, Stevens C, Spaite D, et al. Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(11):1091–107. - PubMed
    1. Asaro PV, Lewis LM, Boxerman SB. The impact of input and output factors on emergency department throughput. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(3):235–42. - PubMed
    1. Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Zhang D. Evolution of quality: first fifty issues of production and operations management. Prod Oper Manag. 2005;14(4):468–82.