American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials
- PMID: 21294106
- PMCID: PMC3115717
- DOI: 10.1002/art.30129
American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials
Abstract
Objective: Remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly attainable goal, but there is no widely used definition of remission that is stringent but achievable and could be applied uniformly as an outcome measure in clinical trials. This work was undertaken to develop such a definition.
Methods: A committee consisting of members of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative met to guide the process and review prespecified analyses from RA clinical trials. The committee requested a stringent definition (little, if any, active disease) and decided to use core set measures including, as a minimum, joint counts and levels of an acute-phase reactant to define remission. Members were surveyed to select the level of each core set measure that would be consistent with remission. Candidate definitions of remission were tested, including those that constituted a number of individual measures of remission (Boolean approach) as well as definitions using disease activity indexes. To select a definition of remission, trial data were analyzed to examine the added contribution of patient-reported outcomes and the ability of candidate measures to predict later good radiographic and functional outcomes.
Results: Survey results for the definition of remission suggested indexes at published thresholds and a count of core set measures, with each measure scored as 1 or less (e.g., tender and swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein [CRP] level, and global assessments on a 0-10 scale). Analyses suggested the need to include a patient-reported measure. Examination of 2-year followup data suggested that many candidate definitions performed comparably in terms of predicting later good radiographic and functional outcomes, although 28-joint Disease Activity Score-based measures of remission did not predict good radiographic outcomes as well as the other candidate definitions did. Given these and other considerations, we propose that a patient's RA can be defined as being in remission based on one of two definitions: (a) when scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP (in mg/dl), and patient global assessment (0-10 scale) are all ≤ 1, or (b) when the score on the Simplified Disease Activity Index is ≤ 3.3.
Conclusion: We propose two new definitions of remission, both of which can be uniformly applied and widely used in RA clinical trials. We recommend that one of these be selected as an outcome measure in each trial and that the results on both be reported for each trial.
Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Rheumatology.
Comment in
-
To improve outcomes we must define and measure them: toward defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):587-9. doi: 10.1002/art.30199. Arthritis Rheum. 2011. PMID: 21294107 No abstract available.
-
Definition of rheumatoid arthritis remission in clinical practice: comment on the article by Felson et al.Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Nov;63(11):3642; author's reply 3644. doi: 10.1002/art.30554. Arthritis Rheum. 2011. PMID: 21792824 No abstract available.
-
A suggestion and the larger perspective on the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism remission definitions: comment on the article by Felson et al.Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Nov;63(11):3643-4; author's reply 3644. doi: 10.1002/art.30551. Arthritis Rheum. 2011. PMID: 21792825 No abstract available.
-
Clinical contrasts with the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definitions of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials: Comment on the article by Felson et al.Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Nov;63(11):3642-3; author's reply 3644. doi: 10.1002/art.30552. Arthritis Rheum. 2011. PMID: 21792830 No abstract available.
References
-
- Smolen JS, Aletaha D. What should be our treatment goal in rheumatoid arthritis today? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24(6 Suppl 43):S–13. - PubMed
-
- Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalo-Repo M, Nissila M, Kautiainen H, Korpela M, et al. Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FIN-RACo trial group. Lancet. 1999;353(9164):1568–73. - PubMed
-
- Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, Durez P, Chang DJ, Robertson D, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9636):375–82. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
