Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;164(4):797-806.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10239.x. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

Noninvasive genomic detection of melanoma

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Noninvasive genomic detection of melanoma

W Wachsman et al. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Early detection and treatment of melanoma is important for optimal clinical outcome, leading to biopsy of pigmented lesions deemed suspicious for the disease. The vast majority of such lesions are benign. Thus, a more objective and accurate means for detection of melanoma is needed to identify lesions for excision.

Objectives: To provide proof-of-principle that epidermal genetic information retrieval (EGIR™; DermTech International, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A.), a method that noninvasively samples cells from stratum corneum by means of adhesive tape stripping, can be used to discern melanomas from naevi.

Methods: Skin overlying pigmented lesions clinically suspicious for melanoma was harvested using EGIR. RNA isolated from the tapes was amplified and gene expression profiled. All lesions were removed for histopathological evaluation.

Results: Supervised analysis of the microarray data identified 312 genes differentially expressed between melanomas, naevi and normal skin specimens (P<0·001, false discovery rate q<0·05). Surprisingly, many of these genes are known to have a role in melanocyte development and physiology, melanoma, cancer, and cell growth control. Subsequent class prediction modelling of a training dataset, consisting of 37 melanomas and 37 naevi, discovered a 17-gene classifier that discriminates these skin lesions. Upon testing with an independent dataset, this classifier discerned in situ and invasive melanomas from naevi with 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic of 0·955.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that EGIR-harvested specimens can be used to detect melanoma accurately by means of a 17-gene genomic biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Hierarchical clustering analysis of differentially expressed genes among melanomas, naevi and normal skin. These 312 genes determined from microarray analysis of epidermal genetic information retrieval specimens differentiate melanoma from atypical naevi and normal skin (P<0·001, false discovery rate q<0·05).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of epidermal genetic information retrieval-harvested melanoma specimens identifies overexpressed genes involved in melanocyte development and pigmentation. Melanocyte development and pigmentation is primarily regulated by microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), which is controlled mainly through the melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) signalling pathway that includes adenylate cyclase 2 (ADCY2), sex determining region Y-box 10 (SOX10) and paired box 3 (PAX3) as well as the v-kit Hardy–Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (Kit) signalling pathway. Tyrosinase (TYR), tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1) and dopachrome tautomerase (DCT) are activated by MITF and are also involved in skin pigmentation.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Hierarchical clustering of melanomas and naevi using the 17-gene classifier. Shown are data from the training set of 37 melanomas and 37 naevi. The specimen denoted by the arrow was called a Clark naevus on initial pathological review, but was deemed a melanoma by the 17-gene classifier. The presence of invasive melanoma was detected in this biopsy by both the primary and central dermatopathologists upon re-review of the serially sectioned specimen.

Comment in

References

    1. Lens MB, Dawes M. Global perspectives of contemporary epidemiological trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:179–85. - PubMed
    1. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2010.
    1. Minor DR, Moore D, Kim C, et al. Prognostic factors in metastatic melanoma patients treated with biochemotherapy and maintenance immunotherapy. Oncologist. 2009;14:995–1002. - PubMed
    1. Goldsmith LA, Askin FB, Chang AE, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Early Melanoma. JAMA. 1992;268:1314–19. - PubMed
    1. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms