Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 4:6:11.
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-11.

International Conference on Advances in Radiation Oncology (ICARO): outcomes of an IAEA meeting

Affiliations

International Conference on Advances in Radiation Oncology (ICARO): outcomes of an IAEA meeting

Eeva K Salminen et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

The IAEA held the International Conference on Advances in Radiation Oncology (ICARO) in Vienna on 27-29 April 2009. The Conference dealt with the issues and requirements posed by the transition from conventional radiotherapy to advanced modern technologies, including staffing, training, treatment planning and delivery, quality assurance (QA) and the optimal use of available resources. The current role of advanced technologies (defined as 3-dimensional and/or image guided treatment with photons or particles) in current clinical practice and future scenarios were discussed.ICARO was organized by the IAEA at the request of the Member States and co-sponsored and supported by other international organizations to assess advances in technologies in radiation oncology in the face of economic challenges that most countries confront. Participants submitted research contributions, which were reviewed by a scientific committee and presented via 46 lectures and 103 posters. There were 327 participants from 70 Member States as well as participants from industry and government. The ICARO meeting provided an independent forum for the interaction of participants from developed and developing countries on current and developing issues related to radiation oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams EJ, Warrington AP. A comparison between cobalt and linear accelerator-based treatment plans for conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:304–10. doi: 10.1259/bjr/77023750. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rachivandran R. Has the time come for doing away with Cobalt-60 teletherapy for cancer treatments? J Med P. 2009;34:63–5. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.51931. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vikram B, Coleman CN, Deye JA. Current status and future potential of advanced technologies in radiation oncology. Part 1: Challenges and resources. Oncology. 2009;23:279–83. - PubMed
    1. Vikram B, Coleman CN, Deye JA. Current status and future potential of advanced technologies in radiation oncology. Part 2: State of the science by anatomic site. Oncology. 2009;23:380–5. - PubMed
    1. Veldeman L, Madani I, Hulstaert F, De Meerleer G, Mareel M, De Neve W. Evidence behind use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:367–375. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70098-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources