Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 9;19(3):368-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.12.021. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

Crystal structure of a human cleavage factor CFI(m)25/CFI(m)68/RNA complex provides an insight into poly(A) site recognition and RNA looping

Affiliations

Crystal structure of a human cleavage factor CFI(m)25/CFI(m)68/RNA complex provides an insight into poly(A) site recognition and RNA looping

Qin Yang et al. Structure. .

Abstract

Cleavage factor I(m) (CFI(m)) is a highly conserved component of the eukaryotic mRNA 3' processing machinery that functions in sequence-specific poly(A) site recognition through the collaboration of a 25 kDa subunit containing a Nudix domain and a larger subunit of 59, 68, or 72 kDa containing an RNA recognition motif (RRM). Our previous work demonstrated that CFI(m)25 is both necessary and sufficient for sequence-specific binding of the poly(A) site upstream element UGUA. Here, we report the crystal structure of CFI(m)25 complexed with the RRM domain of CFI(m)68 and RNA. The CFI(m)25 dimer is clasped on opposite sides by two CFI(m)68 RRM domains. Each CFI(m)25 subunit binds one UGUA element specifically. Biochemical analysis indicates that the CFI(m)68 RRMs serve to enhance RNA binding and facilitate RNA looping. The intrinsic ability of CFI(m) to direct RNA looping may provide a mechanism for its function in the regulation of alternative poly(A) site selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall structure of the CFIm complex (A) Cartoon diagram of the CFIm complex. The CFIm25 homodimer, colored in dark green and lime, is flanked by the RRM domain of two CFIm68 monomers colored in lavender and blue. In CFIm68, loops connecting β11 (residues 87-93) and β23 (residues 115-125) are shown as thicker tubes and colored in magenta and brown, respectively. The RRM C-terminal α-helix (α3, residues 161-172) is highlighted in gold. See also Figure S1 (B) CFIm complex rotated 90° compared to A. (C) Surface representation of the CFIm complex in the same orientation as in A. (D) Topological representation of the secondary structure elements of the CFIm68 RRM. A sequence comparison between CFIm68 and consensus RNP is shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interactions between the CFIm25 homodimer and one CFIm68 subunit. Close-up view of interactions between the CFIm25 dimer and a CFIm68 monomer (Mol D) mediated by (A) hydrophobic stacking and (B) hydrogen bonding. The proteins are colored as in Figure 1. Residues involved in protein-protein interactions are shown as stick model and colored according to the molecule and domain they belong to. See also Figure S2. (C) Schematic representation of the CFIm25-CFIm68 interactions. CFIm25 residues are represented with ellipses, CFIm68 residues with rectangles. Stacking interactions are represented by black wavy lines and hydrogen bonds by red dashed lines. Filled boxes represent main chain interactions, whereas open boxes indicate side chain interactions. Residues are colored as in A and B. (D) A sequence alignment of the CFIm68 RRM homologs from various species listed below. Consensus RNPs are delineated by the blue boxes. Residues with more than 70% conservation are colored in red. Strictly conserved residues are in the filled red boxes. Species abbreviations are as follows: Hs, Homo sapiens; Gg, Gallus gallus; Mm, Mus musculus; Xl, Xenopus laevis; Dr, Danio rerio; Is, Ixodes scapularis; Ci, Ciona intestinalis; Am, Apis mellifera; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Ag, Anopheles gambiae; Sm, Schistosoma mansoni. See also Figure S6 for a more complete alignment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The CFIm complex binds two UGUA elements simultaneously. (A) Overview of the CFIm-UAUUUUGUA complex. RNA molecules are shown as stick model and colored in yellow and salmon. Simulated annealing omit map for the RNA molecules is shown as a blue mesh and contoured a 2.5σ. (B) A close up view of the bound RNA molecules. Density was observed for the UGUA elements and the ribose of the base preceding the first U (U0). (C) A close up view of CFIm25 interacting with UGUA elements in Mol A. Residues participating in RNA binding are shown in stick model representation. Hydrogen bonds are represented by red dashed lines. (D) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) of CFIm variants in complex with various PAPOLA RNA sequence variants. An asterisk (*) indicates that the protein underwent reductive methylation. A single prime (′) represents the first UGUA element, and double prime (″) represents the second UGUA element. See also Figure S3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The CFIm68 RRM facilitates RNA looping (A) A close up view of the CFIm68 RRM (Mol D). The β-sheet is colored in blue, α1 and α2 in green, C-terminal helix α3 in gold, loop β11 in pink, loop β23 in brown and the other loops in white. Mutated residues are shown as stick models. (B) EMSA data of CFIm in complex with PAPOLA RNA variants with spacers of various lengths. UGUA elements are highlighted in red. Inserted nucleotides and nucleotides moved from their original position are shown in green. EMSA data were plotted based on bound fractions relative to the wild type PAPOLA 21mer. Error bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate experiments. (C) Bar graph representation of the EMSA of CFIm68 RRM variants in complex with wild type CFIm25 and 21 mer PAPOLA RNA. Error bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate experiments. (D) EMSA of CFIm68 RRM variants in complex with wild type CFIm25 and PAPOLA RNA variants with spacers of various lengths, or PAPOLG. Error bars represent the standard deviation from duplicate experiments. All bound fractions in figure (B), (C) and (D) were plotted relative to the wild type complex and wild type 21mer PAPOLA RNA. The error bars represent the standard deviation. See also Figure S5. (E) and (F) Protein residues that were subjected to alanine substitution are shown in surface representation. The red color represents a decrease greater than 80% in RNA binding efficiency by CFIm68 E111A, W90A/W91A/D94A and W90A/W91A/N117A/R118A; magenta represents a 50% decrease by CFIm25 E154A, and pink represents a less than 40% decrease by CFIm68 Y84A/L128A. Green indicates an increase in RNA binding efficiency by CFIm68 F126A.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Model illustrating how CFIm68 may facilitate RNA looping. RNA is shown as a red line. UGUA elements are highlighted by ovals. Dashed lines indicate that the RNA is below the RRM surface. See also Figure S4
Figure 6
Figure 6
Model illustrating how CFIm may mediate alternative polyadenylation. (A) Cleavage reaction occurs at poly(A) site 1. (B) Cleavage reaction occurs at poly(A) site 2.

Comment in

References

    1. Adams PD, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Hung LW, Ioerger TR, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Read RJ, Sacchettini JC, Sauter NK, Terwilliger TC. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002;58:1948–1954. - PubMed
    1. Allain FH, Howe PW, Neuhaus D, Varani G. Structural basis of the RNA-binding specificity of human U1A protein. EMBO J. 1997;16:5764–5772. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auweter SD, Fasan R, Reymond L, Underwood JG, Black DL, Pitsch S, Allain FH. Molecular basis of RNA recognition by the human alternative splicing factor Fox-1. EMBO J. 2006;25:163–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Awasthi S, Alwine JC. Association of polyadenylation cleavage factor I with U1 snRNP. RNA. 2003;9:1400–1409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chao JA, Patskovsky Y, Patel V, Levy M, Almo SC, Singer RH. ZBP1 recognition of beta-actin zipcode induces RNA looping. Genes Dev. 2010;24:148–158. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms