Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;32(3):230-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

Placental volume and vascular flow assessed by 3D power Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Affiliations

Placental volume and vascular flow assessed by 3D power Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcomes

A O Odibo et al. Placenta. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the utility of first-trimester 3D-placental volume and vascular flow indices in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: A prospective cohort study including women with singleton pregnancies seen between 11 and 14 weeks as part of a screening program for aneuploidy. Placental volume and vascularization indices were obtained using 3D power Doppler imaging and the VOCAL technique. Placental volume (PV), Vascularization Index (VI), Flow Index (FI) and Vascularization Flow Index (VFI) were calculated. The adverse pregnancy outcomes investigated include preeclampsia (PE), gestational hypertension (GH) and small for gestational age (SGA). The predictive ability of each variable was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: Of 388 women included, PE was seen in 30 (7.7%), GH in 37 (9.0%) and SGA in 31 (8.0%). Placental volume was not significantly different between the pregnancies with adverse outcomes and those without. The mean values of the VI and VFI were significantly lower in the pregnancies that developed PE but not in GH or SGA. The area under the ROC curve for the prediction of PE was 0.71, 0.69 and 0.70 for VI, FI and VFI, respectively.

Conclusion: The study confirms lower 3D power Doppler vascular flow indices in pregnancies that develop PE. The discriminatory ability of using these indices alone for predicting PE appears modest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study subjects
Figure 2
Figure 2
A–C:Box and whisker plots for vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) in women who developed preeclampsia versus unaffected women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A–C:Box and whisker plots for vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) in women who developed preeclampsia versus unaffected women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A–C:Box and whisker plots for vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) in women who developed preeclampsia versus unaffected women.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting preeclampsia using VFI (after adjusting for placental location and maternal BMI)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hafner E, Philipp T, Schuchter K, Dillinger-Paller B, Philipp K, Bauer P. Second-trimester measurements of placental volume by three-dimensional ultrasound to predict small-for gestational- age infants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:97–102. - PubMed
    1. Pairleitner H, Steiner H, Hasenoehrl G, Staudach A. Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:139–143. - PubMed
    1. Hafner T, Kurjak A, Funduk-Kurjak B, Bekavac I. Assessment of early chorionic circulation by three-dimensional power Doppler. J Perinat Med. 2002;30(1):33–39. - PubMed
    1. Matijevic R, Kurjak A. The assessment of placental blood vessels by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. J Perinat Med. 2002;30:26–32. - PubMed
    1. Pretorius DH, Nelson TR, Baergen RN, Pai E, Cantrell C. Imaging of placental vasculature using three-dimensional ultrasound and color power Doppler: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:45–49. - PubMed