Candesartan versus imidapril in hypertension: a randomised study to assess effects of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies
- PMID: 21296780
- DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.192104
Candesartan versus imidapril in hypertension: a randomised study to assess effects of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies
Abstract
Background: Anti-angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1 receptor) autoantibodies have previously been shown in sera of hypertensive patients. This study assessed whether anti-AT1-receptor autoantibody in serum is correlated with the efficacy of an AT1-receptor blocker (ARB; candesartan)-based regimen in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of treatment.
Design: The Study of Optimal Treatment in Hypertensive Patients with Anti-AT1-Receptor Autoantibodies is a multicentre, randomised, blinded endpoint, open-label, parallel-group comparison clinical trial conducted in five centres in Wuhan, China. Treatment is designed as stepwise added-on therapy to reduce blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg. 512 patients with moderate to severe primary hypertension were randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment with either ARB (candesartan)-based regimen (n=257) or ACE inhibitor (imidapril)-based regimen (n=255).
Results: Systolic and diastolic BP was reduced significantly in both treatment groups. The candesartan-based regimen achieved a significantly greater systolic BP reduction than imdapril (30.8 ± 10.3 vs 28.8 ± 10.3 mm Hg, p = 0.023). In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-positive hypertensive patients, the mean systolic BP at baseline was higher than in the anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative group (160.5 ± 16.5 vs 156.2 ± 17.7 mm Hg; p = 0.006). The mean BP reduction was greater in the candesartan-based regimen than the imidapril-based regimen (-35.4 ± 9.8/16.9 ± 6.9 vs -29.4 ± 9.8/14.2 ± 6.9 mm Hg; p = 0.000 and 0.002, respectively), and more patients on imidapril required add-on medications to achieve BP control (94% vs 86%; p=0.03). No correlation was observed between the titre of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody and the efficacy of candesartan-based therapy. In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative patients similar BP lowering was reached in the candesartan and the imidapril-based regimens.
Conclusions: An ARB-based regimen is more effective in BP lowering than an ACE inhibitor-based regimen in the presence of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies. Trial registration number This trial has been registered at http://www.register.clinicaltrials.gov/ (identifier: NCT00360763).
Comment in
-
Hypertension: AT1 autoantibodies and response to therapy.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Apr;8(4):182. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.24. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21553725 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, noninferiority trial of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of imidapril and candesartan in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the Iberian Multicenter Imidapril Study on Hypertension (IMISH).Clin Ther. 2006 Dec;28(12):2040-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.006. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 17296460 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of autoantibodies against AT1 receptor and AGTR1 polymorphisms on candesartan-based antihypertensive regimen: results from the study of optimal treatment in hypertensive patients with anti-AT1-receptor autoantibodies trial.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Jan;8(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Oct 13. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 24131669
-
A multicentre, 12-week study of imidapril and candesartan cilexetil in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(6):407-17. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727060-00004. Clin Drug Investig. 2007. PMID: 17506591 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on end-organ protection: can we do better?Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1803-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.019. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18035185 Review.
-
Dual blockade with candesartan cilexetil and lisinopril in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus: rationale and design.J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2003 Jun;4(2):96-9. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2003.019. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2003. PMID: 12806591 Review.
Cited by
-
Stretch-Induced Biased Signaling in Angiotensin II Type 1 and Apelin Receptors for the Mediation of Cardiac Contractility and Hypertrophy.Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 13;11:181. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00181. eCollection 2020. Front Physiol. 2020. PMID: 32231588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hypertension in the Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipient.Front Pediatr. 2017 May 1;5:86. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00086. eCollection 2017. Front Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28507980 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of the Immune System in Hypertension.Physiol Rev. 2017 Jul 1;97(3):1127-1164. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2016. Physiol Rev. 2017. PMID: 28566539 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current topics in angiotensin II type 1 receptor research: Focus on inverse agonism, receptor dimerization and biased agonism.Pharmacol Res. 2017 Sep;123:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 23. Pharmacol Res. 2017. PMID: 28648738 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immune mechanisms of hypertension.Nat Rev Immunol. 2019 Aug;19(8):517-532. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0160-5. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019. PMID: 30992524 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous