Failure of intrauterine contraceptives: a review
Abstract
Accidental pregnancies with intrauterine devices may in part be attributed to inappropriate patient selection, lack of insertion expertise by physicians, and downward migration of IUDs from initial placement position. Available research on these factors is reviewed and a clinical protocol using ultrasound is proposed to detect and correct malpositioned devices.
Similar articles
-
Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1014-1020. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182316308. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 22015868
-
Intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: findings on ultrasound and clinical outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):427.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.058. Epub 2011 Feb 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21345405
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.Contraception. 1991 Dec;44(6):573-88. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90078-t. Contraception. 1991. PMID: 1773615 Review.
-
Transmural migration and perforation of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a case report and review of the literature.Contraception. 2016 Jan;93(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Contraception. 2016. PMID: 26386445 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources