Ceftriaxone versus chloramphenicol in the treatment of enteric fever

Abstract

Fifty-five patients with culture-proven Salmonella typhi and paratyphi enteric fever were assigned to one of two therapeutic regimens. Group I received ceftriaxone 60-80 mg/kg/day intramuscularly for 5-7 days, those in group II received chloramphenicol 50-80 mg/kg/day orally in 4 divided doses for 12-14 days. both groups were comparable as regards age, sex, severity and duration of symptoms prior to admission. A significant reduction in the mean number of days taken for patients to become afebrile, disappearance of clinical signs and symptoms, duration of therapy and hospital stay were observed in patients receiving ceftriaxone as compared to those receiving chloramphenicol. None of the patients receiving ceftriaxone relapsed, while three patients receiving chloramphenicol relapsed. No major reactions were seen with either drug.