Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain revisited with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)
- PMID: 21300493
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.044
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain revisited with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to assess the contrast enhancement patterns of the retrodiscal tissue with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) with respect to different temporomandibular joint disc pathologies. Additionally, we questioned the relationship between the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and the contrast enhancement pattern of the retrodiscal tissue regardless of the TMJ disc position.
Materials and methods: 52 joints of 26 patients (4 males and 22 females) who have pain in at least at one of their TMJ were included in this study. For the qualitative analysis, the joints were divided into four groups in terms of their disc positions: normal (1), partially displaced with or without reduction (2), totally dislocated with reduction (3) and totally dislocated without reduction (4). Besides, two different joint groups were constituted, namely the painful group and painless group according to the clinical findings without taking the TMJ disc positions into account. Quantitative analyses were made by means of measuring signal intensity ratios (SI) ratio at the retrodiscal tissue (from internal side and external side of the each joint) using DCE-MRI and these measurements were analyzed with paired samples t test to define the difference between the measurements. At the second stage, the time-dependent arithmetical mean values of the SI ratios were calculated for each joint group and significant differences between the groups were questioned using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Besides, painful and painless groups which were classified on the basis of the clinical data were compared according to the mean SI ratios found for each joint and the significant differences between these two groups were assessed by means of Student's T test. The results were assessed in 95% confidence interval where the significance level was p<0.05.
Results: A significant difference was observed between the internal and external contrast enhancement of the joints with partial displacement. Another significant difference was found between the average time versus SI ratio curves of the four groups. In consequence of the comparison made between the joints classified as painful and painless on the basis of the clinical data, one more significant difference was observed according to the mean SI ratios of the groups without taking the TMJ disc position into account.
Conclusion: The contrast enhancement patterns in the retrodiscal tissues of the painful joints showed significant differences in comparison with the painless joints. This result supports the hypothesis defending that inflammation and increased vascularity are responsible from the TMJ pain. Besides, the measurements from the retrodiscal tissues of the joints with partial displacement show significant difference between the signals of the displaced and non-displaced parts of the joints. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging revealed that different disc malpositions create different contrast enhancement patterns. On this basis, it is assessed that the types of the disc malpositions, which are believed to be acquired pathologies, are correlated with the retrodiscal inflammation degrees.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
TMJ disorders and pain: assessment by contrast-enhanced MRI.Eur J Radiol. 2009 Apr;70(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.014. Epub 2008 Mar 7. Eur J Radiol. 2009. PMID: 18329212
-
Diagnosis of retrodiscal tissue in painful temporomandibular joint (TMJ) by fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal intensity.Cranio. 2015 Oct;33(4):271-5. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2015.1097295. Epub 2016 Jan 7. Cranio. 2015. PMID: 26740225
-
Recent developments in understanding temporomandibular joint disorders. Part 2: Changes in the retrodiscal tissue.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Sep;29(5):260-3. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600543. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10980559 Review.
-
Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint.Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180(1):6-21. doi: 10.1159/000086194. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005. PMID: 16088129 Review.
-
Temporomandibular joint internal derangement: relationship between joint pain and MR grading of effusion and total protein concentration in the joint fluid.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 May;34(3):175-81. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/49181266. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15897289
Cited by
-
The usefulness of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of pain symptoms in temporomandibular disorders.Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2016 Nov;52(4):93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Sep 5. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2016. PMID: 28408961 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Temporomandibular joint effusion and its relationship with perceived disability assessed using musculoskeletal ultrasound and a patient-reported disability index.Ultrasound. 2015 May;23(2):90-6. doi: 10.1177/1742271X14568608. Epub 2015 Feb 5. Ultrasound. 2015. PMID: 27433242 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Ultrasound in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: An Update and Future Perspectives.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 20;9:926573. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.926573. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35795636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of masticatory muscles in patients with idiopathic condylar resorption.J Dent Sci. 2025 Jul;20(3):1824-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2025.04.031. Epub 2025 May 14. J Dent Sci. 2025. PMID: 40654406 Free PMC article.
-
Disk and joint morphology variations on coronal and sagittal MRI in temporomandibular joint disorders.Clin Oral Investig. 2013 May;17(4):1243-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0803-4. Epub 2012 Aug 7. Clin Oral Investig. 2013. PMID: 22868824
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical