Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;20(2):194-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.044339. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review

Joanne Callen  1 , Andrew Georgiou, Julie Li, Johanna I Westbrook
Affiliations

The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review

Joanne Callen et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Failure to follow-up test results is a critical safety issue. The objective was to systematically review evidence quantifying the extent of failure to follow-up test results and the impact on patient outcomes.

Methods: The authors searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Inspec and the Cochrane Database from 1990 to March 2010 for English-language articles which quantified the proportion of diagnostic tests not followed up for hospital patients. Four reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts and articles for inclusion.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and demonstrated a wide variation in the extent of the problem and the impact on patient outcomes. A lack of follow-up of test results for inpatients ranged from 20.04% to 61.6% and for patients treated in the emergency department ranged from 1.0% to 75% when calculated as a proportion of tests. Two areas where problems were particularly evident were: critical test results and results for patients moving across healthcare settings. Systems used to manage follow-up of test results were varied and included paper-based, electronic and hybrid paper-and-electronic systems. Evidence of the effectiveness of electronic test management systems was limited.

Conclusions: Failure to follow up test results for hospital patients is a substantial problem. Evidence of the negative impacts for patients when important results are not actioned, matched with advances in the functionality of clinical information systems, presents a convincing case for the need to explore solutions. These should include interventions such as on-line endorsement of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search flow for failure to follow-up test results literature, including keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used in search process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Alliance for Patient Safety Summary of the Evidence on Patient Safety: Implications for Research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008
    1. Bates DW, Leape LL. Doing better with critical test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:66–7 - PubMed
    1. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Improving patient care. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:121–8 - PubMed
    1. Cram P, Rosenthal GE, Ohsfeldt R, et al. Failure to recognize and act on abnormal test results: the case of screening bone densitometry. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:90–7 - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK. Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:352–8 - PubMed

Publication types