Maxillary growth after two-stage palatal closure in complete (unilateral and bilateral) clefts of the lip and palate from infancy until 10 years of age
- PMID: 2130173
Maxillary growth after two-stage palatal closure in complete (unilateral and bilateral) clefts of the lip and palate from infancy until 10 years of age
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to clarify the maxillary growth effects following different types of palatal closure in complete clefts of the lip and palate from infancy to 10 years of age. Lip repair, carried out at 5 months in one stage, was accomplished by Tennison's procedure. These patients were then assigned randomly to each of the 4 experimental groups according to the types of clefts and of palatal closure. One group of 14 patients in unilateral cases (Unil-S) and another group of 8 patients in bilateral cases (Bil-S) received mucoperiosteal palatal push-back procedure in a single stage at 20 months. The third group of 16 patients in unilateral cases (Unil-T) and the fourth group of 7 patients in bilateral cases (Bil-T) received the two-stage palatal closure based on Perko technique in which primary veloplasty was accomplished at 20 months and hard palate closure at 5 year 10 months. Non-cleft subjects were served as Controls. A longitudinal maxillary growth was monitored by the measurements of maxillofacial cast models obtained from each of the subjects. The results showed that the growth in depth and height of the maxilla of the Unil-T showed catch-up growth after primary veloplasty and resulted in no significant differences compared to that of the Control in the later phases, however, the Unil-S did not. The maxillary growth inhibition in height was characteristic in both Bil-S and Bil-T after palatal closure. There were no differences between the Bil-S and Bil-T in any dimensions and observation phases. The results indicate that the employment of the two-stage palatal closure is more beneficial for the unilateral cases, however, careful consideration is needed in bilateral cases.
Similar articles
-
Palate morphology after unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate closure.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;35(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.06.007. Epub 2005 Sep 9. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16154317
-
Growth and changes in maxillary arch form in complete unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate children.Cleft Palate J. 1975 Jan;12(00):115-30. Cleft Palate J. 1975. PMID: 1053956
-
Sagittal growth of the facial skeleton of 6-year-old children with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated with two different protocols.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;35(8):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17954030
-
Maxillary growth controversies after two-stage palatal repair with delayed hard palate closure in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: perspectives from literature and personal experience.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Mar;44(2):129-36. doi: 10.1597/06-037.1. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007. PMID: 17328651 Review.
-
Effect of timing of palatal repair on the transverse development of maxillary alveolar arch in complete-cleft cases.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1991 Mar;8(1):15-8. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1991. PMID: 2056341 Review.
Cited by
-
Current knowledge in cleft lip and palate treatment from an orthodontist's point of view.J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(6):313-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01299768. J Orofac Orthop. 1998. PMID: 9857601 Review. English, German.
-
Effect of Relaxing Incisions on the Maxillary Growth after Primary Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair in Mild and Moderate Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan 16;5(1):e1201. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001201. eCollection 2017 Jan. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 28203502 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous