Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;129(1):368-75.
doi: 10.1121/1.3523295.

Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids

Affiliations

Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids

Teresa Y C Ching et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Listening to speech in competing sounds poses a major difficulty for children with impaired hearing. This study aimed to determine the ability of children (3-12 yr of age) to use spatial separation between target speech and competing babble to improve speech intelligibility. Fifty-eight children (31 with normal hearing and 27 with impaired hearing who use bilateral hearing aids) were assessed by word and sentence material. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with speech presented from 0° azimuth, and competing babble from either 0° or ±90° azimuth. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was defined as the difference between SRTs measured with co-located speech and babble and SRTs measured with spatially separated speech and babble. On average, hearing-impaired children attained near-normal performance when speech and babble originated from the frontal source, but performed poorer than their normal-hearing peers when babble was spatially separated from target speech. On average, normal-hearing children obtained an SRM of 3 dB whereas children with hearing loss did not demonstrate SRM. Results suggest that hearing-impaired children may need enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio to hear speech in difficult listening conditions as well as normal-hearing children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean NAL-NL1 target gain (open symbols) and achieved hearing aid gain (filled symbols) as a function of frequency. Hearing aid gain was measured in an HA2-2cc coupler, using broadband speech-weighted noise presented at 65 dB SPL as stimuli. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean SRM for word material (squares) and sentence material (triangles) for children with NH and children with HI who use hearing aids. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahlstrom, J. B., Horwitz, A. R., and Dubno, J. R. (2009). “Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing aids,” Ear Hear. 30, 203–218. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819769c1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akeroyd, M. A. (2006). “The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing,” Int. J. Audiol. 45, S25–S33. 10.1080/14992020600782626 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen, P., and Wightman, F. L. (1994). “Psychometric functions for children’s detection of tones in noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 205–215. - PubMed
    1. Barker, B. A., and Newman, R. S. (2004). “Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming,” Cognition 94, B45–B53. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bench, J., and Bamford, J. (1979). Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children (Academic Press, London: ), pp. 3–479.

Publication types

MeSH terms