Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Mar;223(2):96-103.
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271667. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

[A short-term diagnostic and economic impact model of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[A short-term diagnostic and economic impact model of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis]

[Article in German]
A Rasch et al. Klin Padiatr. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is currently not a part of the neonatal screening program in Germany, but its implementation is being debated. The aim of this study was to model the short-term diagnostic and economic consequences of the implementation of such a screening.

Patients: Cohort of all newborns in Germany per year.

Methods: In total, 3 screening strategies were evaluated by decision modelling. The 3 screening protocols compared were alternative combinations of IRT- and DNA-testing with a final sweat test.

Results: All modelled screening strategies show a comparable diagnostic yield (171-175 CF-cases per year). There is a tendency of slightly higher sensitivity and shorter time to diagnosis for the "IRT-DNA with failsafe" protocol. In comparison to other strategies, the total number of screening-related visits for this protocol is lower, whereas the amount of sweat tests is the highest. All screening strategies are comparable in terms of avoided cases of extremely low height- or weight-for-age (37-38 and 13-14 cases, respectively). The incremental annual diagnostic costs (with deducted diagnostic costs without screening) are 1.13 to 1.16 million EUR. After 3 years of model runtime there is a nearly neutral total budget impact of screening (diagnostic and treatment costs) per cohort.

Conclusion: All screening strategies lead to a considerable reduction of time to diagnosis at acceptable financial expenditures. The findings of this study broaden the current basis for discussion regarding the implementation of cystic fibrosis screening in Germany.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles