Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;67(3):1028-38.
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01547.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Generalized causal mediation analysis

Affiliations

Generalized causal mediation analysis

Jeffrey M Albert et al. Biometrics. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

The goal of mediation analysis is to assess direct and indirect effects of a treatment or exposure on an outcome. More generally, we may be interested in the context of a causal model as characterized by a directed acyclic graph (DAG), where mediation via a specific path from exposure to outcome may involve an arbitrary number of links (or "stages"). Methods for estimating mediation (or pathway) effects are available for a continuous outcome and a continuous mediator related via a linear model, while for a categorical outcome or categorical mediator, methods are usually limited to two-stage mediation. We present a method applicable to multiple stages of mediation and mixed variable types using generalized linear models. We define pathway effects using a potential outcomes framework and present a general formula that provides the effect of exposure through any specified pathway. Some pathway effects are nonidentifiable and their estimation requires an assumption regarding the correlation between counterfactuals. We provide a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of this assumption. Confidence intervals for pathway effect estimates are obtained via a bootstrap method. The method is applied to a cohort study of dental caries in very low birth weight adolescents. A simulation study demonstrates low bias of pathway effect estimators and close-to-nominal coverage rates of confidence intervals. We also find low sensitivity to the counterfactual correlation in most scenarios.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three-stage path model. On top is the overall path model; below are the possible specific pathways. For the dental data, X = birth group, Z1 = enamel defects, Z2 = sealant use, and Y = DMFT.

References

    1. Albert JM. Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models. Statistics in Medicine. 2008;27:1282–1304. - PubMed
    1. Avin C, Shpitser I, Pearl J. Identifiability of path-specific effects. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2005;19:357–363.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Ditlevsen S, Christensen U, Lynch J, Damsgaard MT, Keiding N. The mediation proportion: a structural equation approach for estimating the proportion of exposure effect on outcome explained by an intermediate variable. Epidemiology. 2005;16:114–120. - PubMed
    1. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall Ltd; London: 1993.

Publication types