Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;46(4):1022-38.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01244.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

The impact of Medicare Part D on hospitalization rates

Affiliations

The impact of Medicare Part D on hospitalization rates

Christopher C Afendulis et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the change in prescription drug insurance coverage associated with Medicare Part D reduced hospitalization rates for conditions sensitive to drug adherence.

Data sources/study setting: Hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2007 for 23 states, linked with state-level data on drug coverage.

Study design: We use a difference-in-difference-in-differences approach, comparing changes in the probability of hospitalization before and after the introduction of the Part D benefit in 2006, for individuals aged 65 and older (versus individuals aged 60-64) in states with low drug coverage in 2005 (versus those in states with high pre-Part D drug coverage).

Data collection/extraction methods: Hospitalization rates for selected ambulatory care sensitive conditions in 23 states were computed using data from the Census and Health Care Utilization Project. Drug coverage rates were computed using data from several sources.

Principal findings: For the conditions studied, our point estimates suggest that Part D reduced the overall rate of hospitalization by 20.5 per 10,000 (4.1 percent), representing approximately 42,000 admissions, about half of the reduction in admissions over our study period. Conclusions. The increase in drug coverage associated with Medicare Part D had positive effects on the health of elderly Americans, which reduced use of nondrug health care resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prescription Drug Coverage Rates among Medicare Beneficiaries 2005 and 2006 The figure depicts the 2005 prescription drug coverage rate along the x-axis, and the 2006 coverage rate along the y-axis, for elderly individuals in each of the 23 states in our analysis sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage Reduction in Hospitalization Rates Due to Coverage Change for Individuals Aged 65 and Older, 2007 The figure depicts the percentage reduction in the hospitalization rate, for individuals aged 65 and older in 2007. The percentage reduction is calculated as the difference in the predicted probability of hospitalization in 2007 assuming 2005 and 2007 coverage rates, respectively, divided by the predicted probability assuming 2005 coverage rates. The box for each condition represents the predicted percentage reduction, and the error bars represent the 95 percent confidence interval for each prediction.

References

    1. Ai C, Norton EC. Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters. 2003;80(1):123–29.
    1. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2004;119(1):249–75.
    1. Beta-blocker Heart Attack Study Group. A Randomized Trial of Propranolol in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. II. Morbidity Results. Journal of American Medical Association. 1983;250:2814–19. - PubMed
    1. Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Komaromy M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, Billings J, Stewart A. Preventable Hospitalizations and Access to Health Care. 1995;274(4):305–11. - PubMed
    1. Brophy JM, Joseph L, Rouleau JL. Beta-Blockers in Congestive Heart Failure: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001;134:550–60. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms