Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women with reversed and non-reversed type III female genital mutilation
- PMID: 21306710
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.028
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women with reversed and non-reversed type III female genital mutilation
Abstract
Objective: To record and compare obstetric and neonatal complication rates in women with reversed and non-reversed type III female genital mutilation (FGM).
Methods: A retrospective observational study comparing cesarean delivery rates and neonatal outcomes of primiparous and multiparous women who had or had not undergone reversal of FGM III.
Results: Of the 250 women, 230 (92%) had an FGM reversal. Of these, 50 (21.7%) were primiparous (cesarean delivery rate 17/50; 34%) and 180 (78.3%) were multiparous (cesarean delivery rate 28/180; 15.6%). Of the 20 women who had not had an FGM reversal, 7 (35%) were primiparous (cesarean delivery rate 5/7; 71.4%) and 13 (65%) were multiparous (cesarean delivery rate 7/13; 53.8%). The cesarean delivery rates for primiparae and multiparae were 32.9% and 25%, respectively. Multiparous women with FGM III reversal had a lower possibility of cesarean delivery compared with the hospital multiparous population (P=0.003) and multiparae who had not undergone FGM III reversal (P=0.007). There was no significant association between Apgar scores or blood loss at vaginal delivery and FGM reversal.
Conclusion: Reversal of FGM III significantly reduced the increased risk of cesarean delivery seen with multiparae who have FGM III.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation attending a specialized clinic in a tertiary center.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.055. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26493013
-
Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27793119 Free PMC article.
-
Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5. Epub 2017 Sep 9. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 28889193
-
Systematic Review of Obstetric and Neonatal Complications Associated With Female Genital Mutilation.Nurs Womens Health. 2023 Apr;27(2):152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 6. Nurs Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36893790
-
Female genital mutilation and pregnancy: associated risks.Br J Nurs. 2016 Sep 22;25(17):978-983. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.17.978. Br J Nurs. 2016. PMID: 27666099 Review.
Cited by
-
Empowering change: A cross-sectional study on quality of life in deinfibulated women at Saudi Teaching Hospital, Kassala-Sudan 2023-2024.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;5(2):e0004096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004096. eCollection 2025. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39951464 Free PMC article.
-
Painful gynecologic and obstetric complications of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 31;17(3):e1003088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003088. eCollection 2020 Mar. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32231359 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of female circumcision on maternal and neonatal outcomes after childbirth: a cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 20;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05316-4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36670393 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical