Impact of dexmedetomidine on early extubation in pediatric cardiac surgical patients
- PMID: 21308359
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2140-5
Impact of dexmedetomidine on early extubation in pediatric cardiac surgical patients
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of dexmedetomidine on early extubation in post-operative pediatric cardiac patients compared to patients on standard sedation regimens without dexmedetomidine.
Methods: Retrospective study comparing dexmedetomidine infusion (DEX) to our standard sedation regimens (control).
Results: A total of 269 patients were included (control: n = 180; DEX: n = 89). The mean duration of DEX was 34 ± 2 h. Extubation was achieved in the operating room in 42% of the control group and 42% of the DEX group. Extubation within 24 h of surgery was achieved in 75% of the control group and 76% of the DEX group. Ventilator time in the DEX group was 35 ± 29 h compared to 29 ± 35 h in the control group. The mean cardiovascular intensive care unit (CV ICU) and hospital length of stays were 3 ± 2 and 8 ± 4 days in the DEX group and 3 ± 3 and 8 ± 5 days in the control group. Reintubation rates in the CV ICU were not significantly different. DEX patients received significantly less total intraoperative fentanyl and midazolam but significantly more midazolam rescue doses than the control group in the postoperative period. Post-extubation ventilation was clinically similar in the DEX group as measured by 1 h post-extubation PaCO₂ levels.
Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine did not significantly impact the postoperative course of children compared to standard practice as measured by success of early extubation, ventilator time, and length of stay.
Similar articles
-
A retrospective comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease requiring postoperative sedation.Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Jun;36(5):993-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1110-z. Epub 2015 Feb 8. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25661272
-
[A study of using dexmedetomidine in ventilator bundle treatment in an ICU].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Oct;27(10):836-40. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015. PMID: 27132448 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in severe pediatric burn injury.J Burn Care Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):759-63. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318254d48e. J Burn Care Res. 2012. PMID: 23147214
-
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018. PMID: 29762314
-
Perioperative dexmedetomidine reduces delirium in elderly patients after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.Can J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;66(12):1489-1500. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01440-6. Epub 2019 Jul 1. Can J Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 31264195 English.
Cited by
-
A retrospective comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease requiring postoperative sedation.Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Jun;36(5):993-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1110-z. Epub 2015 Feb 8. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25661272
-
Efficacy of different analgesic or sedative drug therapies in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease undergoing surgery: a network meta-analysis.World J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;15(3):235-245. doi: 10.1007/s12519-019-00252-4. Epub 2019 Apr 23. World J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31016566
-
Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine in critically ill neonates and infants with heart disease.Pediatr Cardiol. 2012 Oct;33(7):1069-77. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0227-6. Epub 2012 Feb 11. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22327182
-
Effectiveness of α2agonists for sedation in paediatric critical care: study protocol for a retrospective cohort observational study.BMJ Open. 2017 May 30;7(5):e013858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013858. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28566361 Free PMC article.
-
Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2011: III. ARDS and ECMO, weaning, mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, pediatrics and miscellanea.Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):542-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2508-1. Epub 2012 Feb 14. Intensive Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22349425 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources