Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;38(5):548-52.
doi: 10.1002/uog.8955. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

Prenatal evaluation of the position of the fetal conus medullaris

Affiliations
Free article

Prenatal evaluation of the position of the fetal conus medullaris

M Hoopmann et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the position of the fetal conus medullaris during pregnancy in relation to the last vertebral body and to examine its use in detecting skin-covered spinal dysraphism.

Methods: This was a retrospective study involving 300 consecutive ultrasound examinations between 15 weeks of gestation and term. Two operators independently assessed images of the spine to determine whether the conus medullaris and the last vertebral body could be visualized in a single image in a midsagittal plane. The distance between these two landmarks (the conus distance) was measured twice by both operators who were not aware of any previous measurements. Intra- and interobserver variability was assessed by 95% limits of agreement. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the relevant contributors to the conus distance and a normal range was computed based on the best-fit model. The normal results were compared with five cases of prenatally detected skin-covered spinal dysraphism.

Results: In 84.7% of the 300 cases, both operators were able to visualize the conus medullaris and the last vertebral body. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement for the intraobserver variability in measurement of conus distance were ± 1.9 mm. For the interobserver variability, they were - 3.7 and 2.5 mm. We found a linear relationship between conus distance and gestational age, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference. The strongest relationship was observed for femur length (conus distance = - 8.2 + femur length (mm)). In the five abnormal cases, conus distance was well below the 5(th) percentile.

Conclusions: Determination of conus distance allows for an objective and feasible assessment of the conus medullaris position. This parameter promises to be useful in the prenatal detection of skin-covered spinal dysraphism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources