Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Mar;13(3):198-205.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00271.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Dario Ribero et al. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The seventh TNM edition introduced a new, specific staging structure for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC).

Objective: To compare the accuracy of the sixth and the new seventh edition to predict survival after hepatectomy for IHC.

Methods: In all, 434 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy at 16 tertiary-care centres (1990-2008) were identified. End points were overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for both T cohorts and stage strata.

Results: After a median follow-up of 32.4 months, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS estimates were 47.1% and 32.9%, and 26.5% and 19.1%, respectively. Overall, both the editions were statistically significant discriminators of OS and RFS (P < 0.05). However, the survival curves of the new T2a and T2b cohorts appear superimposed. Conversely, the old T2 and T3 cohorts accurately stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (P < 0.01). The seventh edition does not show monotonicity of gradients (the T4 category demonstrates significantly better OS and RFS compared with T2 patients). The seventh edition stage I and II are significantly different whereas the old stage I and II were not.

Conclusions: The new seventh edition of the AJCC/UICC Staging System proved to be adequate although further studies are need to confirm its superiority compared with the previous edition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier estimated overall (OS) (A and B) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (C and D) curves stratified for T categories according to the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM Staging System. Survival curves have been truncated when the number at risk is less than 10% of the starting denominator or less than 5
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier estimated overall (OS) (A and B) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (C and D) curves stratified for stage classes according to the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM Staging System. Survival curves have been truncated when the number at risk is less than 10% of the starting denominator or less than 5

References

    1. Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, El-Serag HB. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J Hepatol. 2004;40:472–477. - PubMed
    1. Patel T. Rising incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2001;33:1353–1357. - PubMed
    1. Ikai I, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Kojiro M, et al. Report of the 17th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:676–691. - PubMed
    1. Tan JC, Coburn NG, Baxter NN, Kiss A, Law CH. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma–a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:600–608. - PubMed
    1. Nathan H, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Abballa EK, Zhu AX, Schulick RD, et al. A proposed staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:14–22. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms