Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 May;151(5):768-773.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

The lifetime economic burden of keratoconus: a decision analysis using a markov model

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The lifetime economic burden of keratoconus: a decision analysis using a markov model

Ronald L Rebenitsch et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the expected incremental lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus compared to the expected cost of the treatment of myopia.

Design: Cost estimate from the patient's perspective using a Markov decision model.

Methods: We modeled a hypothetical cohort of people with clinically significant incident keratoconus as defined by the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. We included costs of clinic visits, fitting fees, contact lenses, surgical procedures, and complications. Survival curves of corneal transplants and associated complications were modeled using data from the 2007 Australian Graft Registry. Medical treatment regimens after surgery were defined by expert opinion.

Results: The expected value of the lifetime cost of the treatment of keratoconus over myopia was $25 168 with a standard deviation of $16 247 and a median of $17 596. The factors that most influenced the lifetime cost were the probability of initial corneal transplant and a subsequent regraft. The cost of routine care had relatively little influence on the lifetime cost of care.

Conclusions: The expected lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus represents a significant cost to patients and payors. While the cost of routine care for keratoconus is not trivial, the primary factor influencing changes in the cost of care for keratoconus is the probability of corneal transplant. Combined with the significantly impaired vision-related quality of life and the relatively young onset of disease, the economic burden of the treatment of keratoconus represents a significant public health concern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Diagram of Markov model simulation of keratoconus treatment.

References

    1. Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(3):267–273. - PubMed
    1. Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, Gordon MO. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(4):527–535. - PubMed
    1. Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, Sterling J, Gordon MO. Changes in the quality-of-life of people with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(4):611–617. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crews MM, Driebe WT, Stern BA. The clinical management of keratoconus: a 6 year retrospective study. CLAO J. 1994;20:194–197. - PubMed
    1. Lass JH, Lembach RG, Park SB, et al. Clinical management of keratoconus. A multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(4):433–445. - PubMed

Publication types