Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000412.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000412.

Some lessons for the future from the Global Malaria Eradication Programme (1955-1969)

Affiliations
Review

Some lessons for the future from the Global Malaria Eradication Programme (1955-1969)

José A Nájera et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Encouraged by the early success of using dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) against malaria, the World Health Organization (WHO) embarked on the Global Malaria Eradication Program (GMEP) in 1955. Fourteen years later, the campaign was discontinued when it was recognised that eradication was not achievable with the available means in many areas, although the long-term goal remained unchanged. During the GMEP, malaria was permanently eliminated from many regions. In other areas, however, substantial gains were lost in resurgences, sometimes of epidemic proportions. During the 1970s and 1980s, because of economic and financial crises, international support for malaria control declined rapidly, but in the past decade, following increasing demands from endemic countries and promising results from scaling up of control activities, interest in malaria elimination and the long-term goal of eradication has received international political and financial support. In 2007, there was a renewed call for malaria eradication and a consultative process to define a research and development agenda for malaria eradication (malERA) was established. Lessons learned from the GMEP (1955-1969) highlight the fact that no single strategy can be applicable everywhere and that a long-term commitment with a flexible strategy that includes community involvement, integration with health systems, and the development of agile surveillance systems is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phases of the Malaria Eradication Campaign as established by WHO in 1963.
Image credit: Fusión Creativa.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Progress of the campaign, presented to the 8th WHA .
Image credit: Fusión Creativa.

References

    1. Boyd MF. Malaria: Retrospect and prospect. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1939;19:1–6.
    1. Livadas GA. Geneva: WHO; 1952. Is it necessary to continue indefinitely DDT residual spraying programmes? Relevant observations made in Greece. WHO document WHO/MAL/79.
    1. Pampana E. London, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1969. A textbook of malaria eradication. 2nd edition. pp. 5–6.
    1. Livadas GA, Georgopoulos G. Development of resistance to DDT by Anopheles sacharovi in Greece. Bull World Health Organ. 1953;8:497–511. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cueto M. Washington (D.C.): Woodrow Wilson Center Press & Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 2007. Cold war, deadly fevers. Malaria eradication in Mexico, 1955–1975.

Publication types

MeSH terms