Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

A research agenda for malaria eradication: vector control

malERA Consultative Group on Vector Control. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Different challenges are presented by the variety of malaria transmission environments present in the world today. In each setting, improved control for reduction of morbidity is a necessary first step towards the long-range goal of malaria eradication and a priority for regions where the disease burden is high. For many geographic areas where transmission rates are low to moderate, sustained and well-managed application of currently available tools may be sufficient to achieve local elimination. The research needs for these areas will be to sustain and perhaps improve the effectiveness of currently available tools. For other low-to-moderate transmission regions, notably areas where the vectors exhibit behaviours such as outdoor feeding and resting that are not well targeted by current strategies, new interventions that target predictable features of the biology/ecologies of the local vectors will be required. To achieve elimination in areas where high levels of transmission are sustained by very efficient vector species, radically new interventions that significantly reduce the vectorial capacity of wild populations will be needed. Ideally, such interventions should be implemented with a one-time application with a long-lasting impact, such as genetic modification of the vectorial capacity of the wild vector population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A formalized analytical framework for the collection, analysis, and central presentation of relevant information.
M&E, monitoring and evaluation. Image credit: Fusión Creativa.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A scheme for the analysis of the development status of the different interventions; similar schemes are used in the commercial development of drugs, for example.
Image credit: Fusión Creativa.

References

    1. Enayati A, Hemingway J. Malaria management: Past, present, and future. Ann Rev Entomol. 2010;55:569–591. - PubMed
    1. Hay SI, Rogers DJ, Toomer JF, Snow RW. Annual Plasmodium falciparum entomological inoculation rates [EIR] across Africa: Literature survey, internet access and review. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:113–127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly-Hope LA, McKenzie FE. The multiplicity of malaria transmission: A review of entomological inoculation rate measurements and methods across sub-Sahan Africa. Malar J. 2009;8:19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaukat AM, Breman JG, McKenzie FE. Using the entomological inoculation rate to assess the impact of vector control on malaria parasite transmission and elimination. Malar J. 2010;9:122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ranson H, Abdallah H, Badolo A, Guelbeogo WM, Kerah-Hinzoumbé C, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae: Data from the first year of a multi-country study highlight the extent of the problem. Malar J. 2009;8:299. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms