A perspective on vascular disrupting agents that interact with tubulin: preclinical tumor imaging and biological assessment
- PMID: 21321746
- PMCID: PMC3071431
- DOI: 10.1039/c0ib00135j
A perspective on vascular disrupting agents that interact with tubulin: preclinical tumor imaging and biological assessment
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment provides a rich source of potential targets for selective therapeutic intervention with properly designed anticancer agents. Significant physiological differences exist between the microvessels that nourish tumors and those that supply healthy tissue. Selective drug-mediated damage of these tortuous and chaotic microvessels starves a tumor of necessary nutrients and oxygen and eventually leads to massive tumor necrosis. Vascular targeting strategies in oncology are divided into two separate groups: angiogenesis inhibiting agents (AIAs) and vascular disrupting agents (VDAs). The mechanisms of action between these two classes of compounds are profoundly distinct. The AIAs inhibit the actual formation of new vessels, while the VDAs damage and/or destroy existing tumor vasculature. One subset of small-molecule VDAs functions by inhibiting the assembly of tubulin into microtubules, thus causing morphology changes to the endothelial cells lining the tumor vasculature, triggered by a cascade of cell signaling events. Ultimately this results in catastrophic damage to the vessels feeding the tumor. The rapid emergence and subsequent development of the VDA field over the past decade has led to the establishment of a synergistic combination of preclinical state-of-the-art tumor imaging and biological evaluation strategies that are often indicative of future clinical efficacy for a given VDA. This review focuses on an integration of the appropriate biochemical and biological tools necessary to assess (preclinically) new small-molecule, tubulin active VDAs for their potential to be clinically effective anticancer agents.
Figures
- A)
Scanning Electron Microscopy reveals disorganized tumor vasculature with many tortuous microvessels and blind ends. A 13762NF mammary adenocarcinoma was grown using a kidney tissue-isolated preparation in a syngeneic adult female Fischer 344 rat. Prior to sacrifice the abdominal aorta proximal to the renal artery was perfused with Batson’s #17 polymer generating a vascular cast. The vascular corrosion cast was sputtered with gold-palladium prior to SEM (data obtained in collaboration with Andrew Abbott and Dr. C. Gilpin).
- B)
Immunohistochemistry reveals vascular extent in a Dunning prostate R3327-HI tumor based on anti-CD31 mAb. The tumor was grown in a syngeneic male Copenhagen rat and Hoechst 33342 dye (seen in blue in C) was infused IV followed by tumor excision 60 s later. The green stain shows vascular extent based on anti-CD31 mAb in a frozen 6 μm-thick section. Original magnification x100.
- C)
Extravasated Hoechst dye (blue) reveals tumor perfusion in same slice as B.
- D)
Overlay of the fluorescent images in B and C reveals that essentially all blood vessels were perfused in this tumor.
- A)
Human prostate PC3-Luc cells were implanted subcutaneously in the right thighs of two nude mice and observed by BLI following administration of luciferin 80 μl (40 mg/ml) SC in the shoulder neck region. Images were acquired every 60 s for 30 mins to observe the dynamic evolution of the bioluminescent signal (dynamic BLI). Following a baseline time course, CA4P was administered IP (100 μl; 150 mg/kg) and 2 h later dBLI was repeated with fresh luciferin. DBLI was repeated the following day.
- B)
Mean light intensity indicated a maximum at 25 min under control conditions. Following CA4P light emission was decreased at least 90%. Twenty-four hours later there was substantial recovery in light emission reaching about 30% of baseline.
References
-
- McKeage MJ, Baguley BC. Cancer. 2010;116:1859–1871. - PubMed
-
- Tozer GM, Kanthou C, Baguley BC. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5:423–435. - PubMed
-
- Siemann DW, Bibby MC, Dark GG, Dicker AP, Eskens FA, Horsman MR, Marme D, Lorusso PM. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:416–420. - PubMed
-
- Dougherty GJ, Chaplin DJ. In: Vascular Disruptive Agents for the Treatment of Cancer. Meyer T, editor. Springer; New York: 2010. pp. 1–27. Chapter 1.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- P41 RR002584/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA139043/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- S10 RR025648/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- S10 RR024757/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- P41 RR02584/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U24 CA126608/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 1S10RR024757-01/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- 1S10RR025648-01/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA140674/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 1R01 CA140674-01A1/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA142543/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 1U24 CA126608/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
