What does it take to have sustained use of decision aids? A programme evaluation for the Breast Cancer Initiative
- PMID: 21323821
- PMCID: PMC5057173
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00640.x
What does it take to have sustained use of decision aids? A programme evaluation for the Breast Cancer Initiative
Abstract
Background: The Breast Cancer Initiative (BCI) was started in 2002 to disseminate breast cancer decision aids (PtDAs) to providers.
Methods: We analysed BCI programme data for 195 sites and determined the proportion of sites involved in each of five stages of dissemination and implementation of PtDAs. We conducted cross-sectional mail and telephone surveys of 79 sites with the most interest in implementation. We examined barriers associated with sustained use of the PtDAs.
Results: Since 2002 we attempted contact with 195 sites to join the BCI. The majority indicated interest in using PtDAs 172 of 195 (88%), 93 of 195 signed up for the BCI (48%), 57 of 195 reported distributing PtDAs to at least one patient (57%), and 46 of 195 reported sustained use (24%). We analysed data from interviews with 59 of 79 active sites (75% response rate). The majority of providers 49 of 59 (83%) had watched the PtDAs, and 46 of 59 (78%) distributed them to patients. The most common barriers were lack of a reliable way to identify patients before decisions are made (37%), a lack of time to distribute the PtDAs (22%) and having too many educational materials (15%). Sites that indicated a lack of clinician support as a barrier were significantly less likely to have sustained use compared to sites that didn't (33% vs. 74%, P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Community breast cancer providers, both physicians and non-physicians, express a high interest in using PtDAs with their patients. About a quarter of sites report sustained use of the PtDAs in routine care.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Figures


References
-
- O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 1995; 15: 25–30. - PubMed
-
- O’Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Medical Decision Making, 2007; 27: 554–574. - PubMed
-
- Coulter A. Implementating shared decision making in the UK: a report for the Health Foundation. London: The Health Foundation; 2010.
-
- Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007; 25: 1067–1073. - PubMed
-
- Collins ED, Moore C, Clay K et al. Can women make an informed decision for mastectomy? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008; 27: 519–525. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical