Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Mar;84(999):210-5.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/21667521.

Comparison of diamond-like carbon-coated nitinol stents with or without polyethylene glycol grafting and uncoated nitinol stents in a canine iliac artery model

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of diamond-like carbon-coated nitinol stents with or without polyethylene glycol grafting and uncoated nitinol stents in a canine iliac artery model

J H Kim et al. Br J Radiol. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Neointimal hyperplasia is a major complication of endovascular stent placement with consequent in-stent restenosis or occlusion. Improvements in the biocompatibility of stent designs could reduce stent-associated thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. We hypothesised that the use of a diamond-like carbon (DLC)-coated nitinol stent or a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-DLC-coated nitinol stent could reduce the formation of neointimal hyperplasia, thereby improving stent patency with improved biocompatibility.

Methods: A total of 24 stents were implanted, under general anaesthesia, into the iliac arteries of six dogs (four stents in each dog) using the carotid artery approach. The experimental study dogs were divided into three groups: the uncoated nitinol stent group (n = 8), the DLC-nitinol stent group (n = 8) and the PEG-DLC-nitinol stent group (n = 8).

Results: The mean percentage of neointimal hyperplasia was significantly less in the DLC-nitinol stent group (26.7±7.6%) than in the nitinol stent group (40.0±20.3%) (p = 0.021). However, the mean percentage of neointimal hyperplasia was significantly greater in the PEG-DLC-nitinol stent group (58.7±24.7%) than in the nitinol stent group (40.0±20.3%) (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that DLC-coated nitinol stents might induce less neointimal hyperplasia than conventional nitinol stents following implantation in a canine iliac artery model; however, the DLC-coated nitinol stent surface when reformed with PEG induces more neointimal hyperplasia than either a conventional or DLC-coated nitinol stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic drawings of the three stent types. (a) Uncoated nitinol stent. (b) Diamond-like carbon (DLC)-coated nitinol stent. (c) Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-DLC-coated nitinol stent. Si, silicon.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stent placement procedure. (a) Stents (arrows) are placed in both iliac arteries. (b) Angiography immediately after stent placement (n = 4, two stents in each iliac artery) shows good position and expansions of the stents (arrows).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of neointimal hyperplasia in the three different stent groups. DLC, diamond-like carbon; PEG, polyethylene glycol.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cross-sectional photomicrographs of representative serial pathology specimens from the three groups. Low microscopic findings (a–c) show that the neointimal hyperplasia area was significantly less in the diamond-like carbon (DLC)-coated stent (b) compared with that in the nitinol stent (a) and was greater in the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-DLC-coated stent (c) than in the nitinol stent. A high-power microscopic image (d) for the PEG stent (c) shows that a large portion of the neointimal hyperplasia was caused by the overproduction of collagen (arrows) secreted by proliferated fibroblasts. Arrowhead: stent strut.

References

    1. Higashiura W, Kubota Y, Sakaguchi S, Kurumatani N, Nakamae M, Nishimine K, et al. Prevalence, factors, and clinical impact of self-expanding stent fractures following iliac artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:645–52 - PubMed
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007;45 (Suppl S):S5–S7 - PubMed
    1. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1879–88 - PubMed
    1. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation 2007;115:2745–9 - PubMed
    1. Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, Scheinert D, Zeller T, Tielbeek A, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare nitinol stent for obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: the SIROCCO II trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:331–8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms