Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;18(1):171-6.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0029-x.

The predictive mirror: interactions of mirror and affordance processes during action observation

Affiliations

The predictive mirror: interactions of mirror and affordance processes during action observation

Patric Bach et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

An important question for the study of social interactions is how the motor actions of others are represented. Research has demonstrated that simply watching someone perform an action activates a similar motor representation in oneself. Key issues include (1) the automaticity of such processes, and (2) the role object affordances play in establishing motor representations of others' actions. Participants were asked to move a lever to the left or right to respond to the grip width of a hand moving across a workspace. Stimulus-response compatibility effects were modulated by two task-irrelevant aspects of the visual stimulus: the observed reach direction and the match between hand-grasp and the affordance evoked by an incidentally presented visual object. These findings demonstrate that the observation of another person's actions automatically evokes sophisticated motor representations that reflect the relationship between actions and objects even when an action is not directed towards an object.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Top panel shows first and final frames of two example videos showing ‘appropriate’ and ‘inappropriate’ observed reaches. The lower panel shows examples of final frames from each experimental condition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean error rates (left panel) and reaction times (right panel) for each condition in each experiment. Error bars show the within-subjects standard error (from the interaction term, cf. Loftus & Masson, 1994)

References

    1. Bach P, Peatfield NA, Tipper SP. Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception. Experimental Brain Research. 2007;178(4):509–517. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0756-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bach P, Tipper SP. Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments. Cognition. 2007;102(2):151–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertenthal BI, Longo MR, Kosobud A. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2006;32:210–225. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosbach S, Prinz W, Kerzel D. Movement-based compatibility in simple response tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2005;17(5):695–707. doi: 10.1080/09541440540000086. - DOI
    1. Brass M, Bekkering H, Wohlschläger A, Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition. 2000;143:124–143. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1225. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types