Gastrointestinal safety of triflusal solution in healthy volunteers: a proof of concept endoscopic study
- PMID: 21327422
- DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1004-9
Gastrointestinal safety of triflusal solution in healthy volunteers: a proof of concept endoscopic study
Abstract
Purpose: Triflusal is an antiplatelet agent that irreversibly acetylates cyclooxygenase isoform 1 (COX-1) and therefore inhibits thromboxane biosynthesis. It was initially marketed as capsules containing 300 mg of active substance. In 2006 a new 600 mg (10 ml) oral solution form of triflusal was authorized in Spain. The primary aim of this study was to compare the gastrointestinal safety of the new triflusal oral solution with triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers.
Methods: Sixty healthy subjects were randomly assigned, in a 2.5:2.5: 1 ratio, into one of three groups, with 25 subjects receiving one bottle of triflusal oral solution (600 mg) daily, 25 subjects receiving two triflusal capsules (600 mg) once daily, and ten subjects receiving two placebo capsules once daily, respectively, during 7 consecutive days. Gastroscopy was performed at baseline before the administration of study drugs and after 4-8 h of the last dose of study drugs. Effects on the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were measured in accordance with a modified Lanza scale.
Results: No differences between groups were detected at baseline. After treatment, median global scores in the placebo, triflusal solution, and triflusal capsules groups were, respectively, 0, 1, and 3 (p = 0.003 for comparison between placebo and triflusal capsules and p = 0.042 for comparison between triflusal solution and triflusal capsules). There were no significant differences between the scores on the triflusal solution and placebo groups. All treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusion: In healthy subjects, triflusal solution induced less endoscopically apparent gastrointestinal mucosal damage than triflusal capsules and did not induce more damage than the placebo in healthy volunteers.
Similar articles
-
Comparative bioavailability study of triflusal oral solution vs. triflusal capsules in healthy subjects. A single, randomized, two-way cross-over, open-label phase I study.Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(1):36-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296246. Arzneimittelforschung. 2010. PMID: 20184225 Clinical Trial.
-
Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers.Arzneimittelforschung. 2008;58(6):283-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296508. Arzneimittelforschung. 2008. PMID: 18677970 Clinical Trial.
-
A phase I study to characterize the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of new enteric-coated triflusal formulations in healthy male volunteers.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011 Dec;7(12):1471-9. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2011.630661. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011. PMID: 22098139 Clinical Trial.
-
Triflusal.Drugs. 1998 Jun;55(6):823-33; discussion 834-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855060-00011. Drugs. 1998. PMID: 9617597 Review.
-
Triflusal: an old drug in modern antiplatelet therapy. Review of its action, use, safety and effectiveness.Hellenic J Cardiol. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):199-207. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19465361 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Frequency and Types of Pathological Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Findings in Clinically Healthy Individuals.Drugs R D. 2020 Jun;20(2):115-124. doi: 10.1007/s40268-020-00303-6. Drugs R D. 2020. PMID: 32335854 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical