Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Jun;38(6):996-1008.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1740-1. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

PET/CT and 3-T whole-body MRI in the detection of malignancy in treated oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

PET/CT and 3-T whole-body MRI in the detection of malignancy in treated oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

Shu-Hang Ng et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a prospective comparison of the diagnostic capability of integrated fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT), 3-T whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and their combination in detecting malignancy in treated oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC).

Methods: Seventy-nine OHSCC patients at a high risk of residual disease or suspected to have recurrence after the completion of chemoradiation were included in the study. All patients underwent PET/CT and WB-MRI within 10 days of each other. Histology and follow-up data were used as the reference standard. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity, while the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used for comparison of diagnostic capabilities.

Results: Twenty-nine patients (36.7%) had residual/recurrent tumours or second primary tumours. Overall, there was a trend towards increased sensitivity and diagnostic capability for PET/CT compared with WB-MRI (72.4 vs 55.2%, p = 0.13; 0.826 vs 0.753, p = 0.24, respectively). The diagnostic capability of combined interpretation of PET/CT and WB-MRI was similar to PET/CT alone (0.827 vs 0.826, p = 0.97) but was significantly higher than WB-MRI alone (0.827 vs 0.753, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: PET/CT showed a trend towards higher diagnostic capability than 3-T WB-MRI in detecting residual/recurrent tumours or second primary tumours in OHSCC. The combined use of PET/CT and WB-MRI provided more added value to WB-MRI alone than to PET/CT alone. Additional PET/CT can be useful in patients with questionable MRI findings of malignancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):71-8 - PubMed
    1. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005 Feb;84(2):104, 106, 108-10 - PubMed
    1. Oral Oncol. 2009 Apr-May;45(4-5):386-93 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;50(1):24-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2009 Jun;19(6):1366-78 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms