Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990;7(1):51-66.
doi: 10.3109/08830189009061764.

Adjuvants

Affiliations
Review

Adjuvants

R Edelman et al. Int Rev Immunol. 1990.

Abstract

In summary, HIV vaccine studies described have generally not been designed to measure the effect of the adjuvant or to make comparisons between adjuvants. In only one study was a head-to-head comparison made between HIV antigen alone and antigen formulated with different adjuvants. We hope that future experiments with HIV/SIV vaccine candidates will be designed to determine the relative potency and safety of different adjuvants. Unfortunately, such experiments tend to be tedious and expensive. The design of these studies will need to address a number of variables which influence the response to the vaccine, including route and schedule of immunization, genotype and species of the vaccinated subject, and intrinsic characteristics of the antigen. In addition, the immunologic endpoints should include measurement of both B and T cell function. The carrier/adjuvant/antigen formulation should be hand-tailored and then standardized so that it is manufactured reproducibly without producing different biological effects between lots, and the vaccine formulation should be stable on storage and shipping. Finally, we obviously need to identify and test the protective antigen or antigens. The best adjuvant will never correct the choice of the wrong epitope.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources