The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer
- PMID: 21330834
- DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181fe8b6e
The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stages IB2-IIB) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (hysterectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection) (NACT + RS) with the survival of those treated with radical surgery (hysterectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection) (RS) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).
Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Patients were followed up for 54 to 114 months (median, 82.8 months). All risk factors that may have affected the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.
Results: From January 2000 to December 2005, 476 eligible patients were followed up. The 5-year DFS rates of the NACT + RS, RS, and CCRT groups were 85.00%, 77.44%, and 52.94%, respectively (P < 0.0001), whereas the 5-year OS rates were 88.67%, 80.21% and 64.37%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The NACT + RS group had significantly higher survival rates than both the RS (DFS: hazard ratio = 1.870, P = 0.0031; OS: hazard ratio = 1.813, P = 0.0175) and CCRT (DFS: hazard ratio = 3.535, P < 0.0001; OS: hazard ratio = 3.157, P < 0.0001) groups, while adjusting for the pathological type, clinical stage, tumor size (initial), and age. The 5-year DFS rate for patients receiving TP (paclitaxel and cisplatin) was 90.55%, and 71.70% for patients receiving PVB (cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomycin); the 5-year OS rates were 96.75% for TP and 70.09% for PVB, respectively. Patients receiving TP had a statistically significant improvement in both 5-year DFS and OS rates (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant NACT + RS improves the long-term DFS and OS of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer stage IB2-IIB compared with RS alone and especially compared with CCRT. In the NACT + RS group, NACT with TP improves the long-term DFS and OS of patients compared with patients who had PVB chemotherapy regimen. These results may provide some useful information for clinicians to treat patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Similar articles
-
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy (with or without Chemotherapy) in Patients with Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dis Markers. 2020 Jul 27;2020:7415056. doi: 10.1155/2020/7415056. eCollection 2020. Dis Markers. 2020. PMID: 32802215 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in the management of stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Apr;117(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.11.017. Epub 2012 Jan 21. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012. PMID: 22265255
-
Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery as Front Line Treatment Strategy in Patients Affected by FIGO Stage III Cervical Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):841-849. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5597-1. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27678502
-
Ten-year survival of patients with locally advanced, stage ib-iib cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy.Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jul;82(1):88-93. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6204. Gynecol Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11426967
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0225264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225264. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31725793 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the survival outcome of neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery with that of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical adenocarcinoma.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):793-801. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05826-6. Epub 2020 Oct 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33009996
-
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy (with or without Chemotherapy) in Patients with Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dis Markers. 2020 Jul 27;2020:7415056. doi: 10.1155/2020/7415056. eCollection 2020. Dis Markers. 2020. PMID: 32802215 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of Response to Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Using Multicenter CT-Based Radiomic Analysis.Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;10:77. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00077. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32117732 Free PMC article.
-
The comparative study for survival outcome of locally advanced cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant arterial interventional chemotherapy or intravenous chemotherapy followed by surgery or concurrent chemoradiation.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 7;20(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02859-w. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36476481 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced stage (IB2-IIA2-IIB) cervical carcinoma: Experience of a tertiary center and comprehensive review of the literature.Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 27;18(3):190-202. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.70493. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34580469 Free PMC article.