A Clinical Communication Strategy to Enhance Effectiveness and CAHPS Scores: The ALERT Model
- PMID: 21331215
- PMCID: PMC3037130
- DOI: 10.7812/TPP/07-066
A Clinical Communication Strategy to Enhance Effectiveness and CAHPS Scores: The ALERT Model
Abstract
The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) program is a national annual report that surveys patients and rates health plans on a variety of metrics, including claims processing, customer service, office staff helpfulness, and ability to get needed care. Although physicians may feel they have no immediate control over many aspects of this questionnaire, there is an important area of the survey where they do have direct control: "how well the doctor communicates."It is well established that effective physician-patient communication has beneficial effects not only on physician and patient satisfaction but also on adherence to medical advice, diagnostic accuracy, and malpractice risk. The creators of the CAHPS survey developed and incorporated four questions seeking to ascertain the patient's impression of the physician's communication skills. These questions assess how well the physician listened carefully to the patient, how often the physician explained things understandably, how often the physician showed respect for what the patient said, and how often the physician spent enough time with the patient.Many excellent clinical communication models exist that touch on aspects of the CAHPS topics, but it behooves physicians to be mindful of the exact survey questions. The ALERT model of communication was developed to facilitate physicians' recall of these measures. By incorporating key verbal and nonverbal communication skills, clinicians can address and improve their scores on this important area of the CAHPS survey.
Similar articles
-
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25287521 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do.Patient. 2013;6(3):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0016-1. Patient. 2013. PMID: 23716167
-
Some Aspects of Patient Experience Assessed by Practices Undergoing Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation Are Measured by CAHPS, Others Are Not.Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):179-187. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000263. Qual Manag Health Care. 2020. PMID: 32991534 Free PMC article.
-
Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):447-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2663-2. Epub 2013 Oct 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24163151 Free PMC article.
-
Will Improvements in Patient Experience With Care Impact Clinical and Quality of Care Outcomes?: A Systematic Review.Med Care. 2021 Sep 1;59(9):843-856. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001598. Med Care. 2021. PMID: 34166268
Cited by
-
Patient Experience in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of CG-CAHPS Surveys.J Patient Exp. 2019 Jun;6(2):93-102. doi: 10.1177/2374373518793143. Epub 2018 Aug 12. J Patient Exp. 2019. PMID: 31218253 Free PMC article.
-
The association between care experiences and parent ratings of care for different racial, ethnic, and language groups in a Medicaid population.Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun;46(3):821-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01234.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28. Health Serv Res. 2011. PMID: 21275987 Free PMC article.
-
Patient demographics as a predictive tool of consultation duration.London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2014;6(4):79-83. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2014.11493421. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2014. PMID: 25949721 Free PMC article.
-
Gender Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e010498. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010498. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 30561253 Free PMC article.
-
Age-specific differences in patient reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Medical expenditure panel survey 2006-2015.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Aug 27;3:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100083. eCollection 2020 Sep. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 34327463 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [homepage on the Internet] Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Updated 2007 Nov 30 [cited 2007 Dec 2]. Available from: www.cahps.ahrq.gov.
-
- Suchman AL, Roter D, Green M, Lipkin M., Jr. Physician satisfaction with primary care office visits. Collaborative Study Group of the American Academy on Physician and Patient. Med Care. 1993 Dec;31(12):1083–92. - PubMed
-
- Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients' satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care. 1989 Nov;27(11):1027–35. - PubMed
-
- Stewart MA. What is a successful doctor–patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(2):167–75. - PubMed
-
- Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jun 27;154(12):1365–70. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources