Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 21332637
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: There are a number of agents used for cervical ripening prior to the induction of labour. Two commonly used agents are intravaginal misoprostol and a transcervical Foley catheter.
Objective: To review the evidence comparing misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter placement for induction of labour, and perform a meta-analysis comparing these two induction agents.
Search strategy: We conducted database searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library Database, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Bibliographies of all relevant articles were reviewed.
Selection criteria: Prospective, randomised trials comparing the use of intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter for the purpose of cervical ripening and induction of labour were included. We excluded studies in which the patients in these two intervention groups also received other induction agents concurrently, such as oral misoprostol, oxytocin, or other prostaglandins.
Data collection and analysis: The primary outcomes selected were time to delivery, and the rates of caesarean section, uterine tachysystole, and chorioamnionitis. Random-effects generalised linear models with a poisson distribution and log link function were used to compare the two induction agents across the studies.
Main results: Nine studies (1603 patients) were identified as eligible to be included in this meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the mean time to delivery (mean difference 1.08 ± 2.19 hours shorter for misoprostol, P = 0.2348), the rate of caesarean delivery (RR 0.991; 95% CI 0.768, 1.278), or in the rate of chorioamnionitis (RR 1.130; 95% CI 0.611, 2.089) between women who received misoprostol compared with transcervical Foley catheter. Patients who received misoprostol had significantly higher rates of tachysystole compared with women who received a transcervical Foley catheter (RR 2.844; 95% CI 1.392, 5.812).
Conclusions: Intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter have similar effectiveness as induction agents. Transcervical Foley catheter is associated with a lower incidence of tachysystole.
© 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.Afr J Med Med Sci. 2005 Dec;34(4):377-82. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2005. PMID: 16752669 Clinical Trial.
-
Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610500040737. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005. PMID: 15814391 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Aug;33(6):572-7. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.786030. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013. PMID: 23919853 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32168947 Free PMC article.
-
Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review.Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):441-3. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 31. Semin Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 26338441 Review.
Cited by
-
Cook's balloon versus dinoprostone for Labour induction of term pregnancies with fetal GROWth restriction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in tertiary maternity hospitals in Spain (COLIGROW study).BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 30;14(9):e089628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089628. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39349375 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical ripening with vaginal Misoprostol plus Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide versus vaginal Misoprostol alone among pregnant women: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.Ghana Med J. 2024 Mar;58(1):44-52. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v58i1.7. Ghana Med J. 2024. PMID: 38957282 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 1;3:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100034. eCollection 2019 Jul. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019. PMID: 31403122 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and effectiveness of different modes of labor induction among pregnant women delivering at referral hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07260-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39905438 Free PMC article.
-
Induction of Labour: Change of Method and its Effects.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Mar;75(3):238-243. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545899. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015. PMID: 25914416 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources