Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):381-5.
doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466007566.

Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes

Jon I Einarsson  1 , Thomas T Vellinga, Andries R Twijnstra, Niraj R Chavan, Yoko Suzuki, James A Greenberg
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes

Jon I Einarsson et al. JSLS. 2010 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

Methods: This was a case series of clinical outcomes following 172 consecutive LM and TLH cases over a 1-year period conducted at a university teaching hospital. It included 172 women (ages 17 to 81), requiring a myomectomy or hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids, pelvic pain, or abnormal uterine bleeding; 117 women underwent TLH and 55 women underwent LM. Patients were contacted over the phone 6 months after surgery to inquire about number of days of postoperative vaginal bleeding, visits to the hospital due to bleeding, dyspareunia, and other potential complications.

Results: For TLH, the average duration of surgery was 109 minutes, average uterine weight was 256 grams (range, 18 to 1242), and average blood loss was 71 mL. In LM, average duration of surgery was 125 minutes, average weight of fibroids was 252 g, average number of fibroids removed was 4.0, and average blood loss was 159 mL. Seven percent of patients and 8% of their partners had persistent dyspareunia after surgery. There were no conversions to laparotomy.

Conclusions: The use of bidirectional barbed suture appears to be safe for closing the vaginal cuff in a TLH and for closing the hysterotomy site during a laparoscopic myomectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No Disclosures or conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Bidirectional barbed suture with barbs that change direction in the middle.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. 2004. [Accessed July 12, 2010]. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf4/k042075.pdf.
    1. Leung JC. Barbed suture technology: Recent advances. Medical Textiles. 2004. October;26-27: 62–80
    1. Rashid RM, Sartori M, White LE, Villa MT, Yoo SS, Alam M. Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:869–872 - PubMed
    1. Rodeheaver GT, Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, et al. Barbed sutures for wound closure: In vivo wound security, tissue compatibility and cosmesis measurements. Society for Biomaterials 30th Annual Meeting Transactions. 2004;229:232
    1. Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:621–623 - PubMed

Publication types