Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):453-5.
doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466006684.

Laparoscopic retrieval of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon

Angie R Taras  1 , Jedediah A Kaufman
Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic retrieval of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon

Angie R Taras et al. JSLS. 2010 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a well-tolerated, widely used contraceptive. A major but infrequent complication of the IUD is perforation of the uterus or cervix and migration of the device into the abdomen. Our case of laparoscopic retrieval of an IUD perforating the sigmoid colon illustrates this rare complication.

Methods: A 36-year-old woman with a history of IUD placement 4 years earlier presented with complaints of abdominal pain and bright red blood per rectum. She had conceived 9 months after IUD placement and suffered a spontaneous abortion requiring an evacuation of the retained products of conception. At presentation, she was afebrile with normal vital signs. Physical examination was significant for tenderness to palpation over the left lower quadrant.

Results: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen and pelvis showed a foreign body through the wall of the uterus and entering the colon. Colonoscopy revealed an IUD penetrating the sigmoid wall, and multiple failed attempts were made to remove the IUD colonoscopically. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed that revealed an IUD perforating the uterus and entering the sigmoid. The IUD was manipulated free and removed, and a suture closed the sigmoid defect. The patient was discharged home on the first postoperative day without complication.

Conclusions: The IUD is one of the most effective, safe, and economic contraceptive methods. Uterine perforation and intraperitoneal translocation is an unusual complication of an IUD. Perforation of hollow viscous is likely even less common. Confirmation of a "missing" IUD is mandatory if pregnancy occurs after IUD placement. Removal of a translocated IUD is recommended, and operative laparoscopy is the preferred method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Computed tomographic scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a foreign body invading the posterior wall of the uterus and entering the colon.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Colonoscopy revealing an IUD penetrating the sigmoid wall with surrounding granulation tissue.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Laparoscopy showing an IUD perforating the uterus and entering the sigmoid.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Laparoscopy showing an IUD perforating the uterus and entering the sigmoid.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cheng D. The intrauterine device: Still misunderstood after all these years. South Med J. 2000;93:859–864 - PubMed
    1. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomquist E, Lindell K. Perforation with intrauterine devices: report from a Swedish survey. Contraception. 1998;57:251–255 - PubMed
    1. Dean G, Goldberg A. The intrauterine contraceptive device. 2004. Available at http://www.uptodate.com Accessed June 5, 2010
    1. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al. Contraceptive Technology. 19th ed New York: Ardent Media, Inc., 2007
    1. Chen CP, Hsu TC, Wang W. Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature. Contraception. 1998;58:295–304 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources