Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 May;41(5):685-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

Five-year results of a randomised clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the saphenofemoral junction

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-year results of a randomised clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the saphenofemoral junction

B C V M Disselhoff et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 May.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFL) improves the results of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in a 5-year randomised clinical trial (RCT).

Methods: Forty-three symptomatic patients (86 limbs) with bilateral incompetent GSVs were randomised so that one limb underwent EVLA without SFL and the other limb underwent EVLA with SFL. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up and two patients died, leaving 30 patients (60 limbs) for analysis. Duplex-confirmed groin varicose vein recurrence and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) were investigated at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months after treatment.

Results: Five-year life table analysis showed freedom from groin varicose vein recurrence in 79% of limbs (95% confidence interval (CI); 67-92%) in the EVLA without SFL group and in 65% of limbs (95%; CI; 51-82) in the EVLA with SFL group (P = 0.36). Groin varicose vein recurrence was due to neo-vascularisation (0%), re-canalisation (9%) and incompetent tributaries in 14% in the EVLA without SFL group, and to neo-vascularisation (33%), re-canalisation (0%) and incompetent tributaries (0%) in the EVLA with SFL group. The VCSS improved significantly and was comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: The rate of varicose vein recurrence was similar in both study groups. There was less neo-vascularisation in the EVLA without SFL group, but more incompetent tributaries and early re-canalisation at 5-year follow-up than in the EVLA with SFL group.

Registration number: ISRCTN60300873 (http://www.clinical-trials.com).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Letter to editor.
    Mumme A. Mumme A. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;42(5):711; author's author 711-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Jul 31. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21810542 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data