Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Apr;25(4):443-8.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.13. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

Sharps injuries in ophthalmic practice

A-J Ghauri  1 , K N Amissah-Arthur, A Rashid, B Mushtaq, M Nessim, S Elsherbiny
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Sharps injuries in ophthalmic practice

A-J Ghauri et al. Eye (Lond). 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Accidental sharps injuries are a potential route for transmission of blood-borne infection to healthcare workers. Ophthalmic staff in particular are at risk of sustaining such injuries due to the microsurgical nature of the speciality. Forthcoming European Union legislation aimed at reducing sharps injuries requires the development of risk-based sharps policy. The authors believe that this is the first study to assess the risks of sharps injuries and their management specific to ophthalmic practice within the European Union.

Methods: A retrospective review of all reported sharps injuries across three eye units in the UK over a period of 6 years was undertaken. Data were analysed to determine the circumstances surrounding the injury, occupation of the injured person, and whether appropriate actions were taken following incidents.

Results: A total of 68 sharps injuries were reported over the 6-year period. Nurses sustained 54.4% (n=37) of needlestick injuries, doctors 39.7% (n=27), and allied healthcare staff 5.9% (n=4). In all 51.5% (n=35) of sharps injuries occurred in the operating theatre, 30.9% (n=21) in the outpatient clinic, 13.2% (n=9) on the ophthalmic ward, and 4.4% (n=3) in unspecified locations. There was a median rate of 1.3 sharps injuries per 1000 surgical procedures per year and a range of 0.4-3.5 per 1000.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the need to raise awareness of the unique risks of sharps injuries in ophthalmic practice. This is necessary in order to develop speciality-specific policy that promotes strategies to reduce such injuries, enhances the accuracy of reporting of such events, and provides guidance for appropriate management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flowchart of universal first aid instructions following sharps injury.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Health Protection Agency Eye of the needle: 2008(cited 9 Sep 2010): http://www.hpa.org.uk/Publications/InfectiousDisea ses/BloodBorneInfecti... .
    1. NHS Employers Prevention of sharps injuries framework agreement6 July 2010 (cited 9 Sep 2010): http://www.nhsemployers.org/HealthyWorkplaces/Heal thAndSafety_new/sharp... .
    1. NHS Employers Needlestick injury(cited 9 Sep 2010): http://www.nhsemployers.org/Aboutus/Publications/D ocuments?Needlestick%... .
    1. Health Protection Agency Shooting up: infections among injecting drug users in the United Kingdom 2008Oct2009(cited 12 Sep 2010): http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/In fectionsAZ/InjectingD... .
    1. Jagger J, Berguer R, Phillips EK, Parker G, Gomaa AE. Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210 (4:496–502. - PubMed

Publication types