Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;16(2):689-98.
doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000200033.

[Auditory brainstem responses evaluation of retrocochlear disease in workers from a general hospital exposed to noise]

[Article in Portuguese]
Affiliations
Free article

[Auditory brainstem responses evaluation of retrocochlear disease in workers from a general hospital exposed to noise]

[Article in Portuguese]
Victor Luiz da Silveira et al. Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

The main purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the presence of retrocochlear disease in a group of maintenance workers from a general hospital, who presents a history of noise exposure. Thirty one workers of three engineering sections with age range from 25 to 60 years and continuous noise exposure from 2 and 45 years, were examined. The evaluation included an audiometric occupational selection and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). ABR abnormalities were detected in seven patients (22.6%) and it was found latency increase of waves III (14.3%) and V (28.6%), and interpeak prolongation I-III (71.4%), III-V (28.6%) and I-V (85.7%). Among 35 ears with normal audition - right, left or both -, four (11,4%) ears presented retrocochlear disease. The high retrocochlear disease prevalence in workers exposed to noise lead us to suppose that this disturbance is more frequent than usually found; therefore it is underestimated in workers diagnostic evaluation. The presence of this kind of disturbance, even with the absence of audiometric alterations, suggests that ABR is more sensitive than the tonal audiometry for noise induced hearing loss investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources