Mineralocorticoid receptors: evolutionary and pathophysiological considerations

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptors (MR), glucocorticoid receptors (GR), progesterone receptors (PR), and androgen receptors (AR) comprise a closely related subfamily within the human 49-member nuclear receptor family. These receptors and their cognate ligands play major roles in homeostasis, reproduction, growth, and development, despite which their evolution and diversification remains incompletely understood. Several conflicting models have been advanced for the evolution of this subfamily. We have thus undertaken Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of this subfamily. The Bayesian consensus and maximum likelihood trees support a basal position for MR, with the PR and AR forming a sister clade. We next performed analyses using topological constraints to directly contrast the likelihood of seven phylogenetic models. In these analyses, three models have similar support: one proposes two sister clades (MR and GR, PR and AR); the other two propose a different subfamily member (MR or GR) to be the first to have diverged. Ancestral state reconstructions at sites critical for physiological function show that the S810L mutation in the MR, which results in the MR being similar to estrogen receptors and the more distantly related retinoic acid receptor-α is likely to reflect the ancestral receptor sequence before the divergence of this subfamily and provides further support for MR having been the first of the subfamily to diverge. Finally, we drew on pathophysiological comparisons to help to distinguish the different models. On the basis of our phylogenetic analyses and pathophysiological considerations, we propose that the MR was the first to diverge from the ancestral gene lineage from which this subfamily derived.