Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm
- PMID: 21343521
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4760
Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of our study was to assess diagnostic performance when retrospectively interpreting full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and breast tomosynthesis examinations under a free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) paradigm.
Materials and methods: We performed FROC analysis of a previously reported study in which eight experienced radiologists interpreted 125 examinations, including 35 with verified cancers. The FROC paradigm involves detecting, locating, and rating each suspected abnormality. Radiologists reviewed and rated both FFDM alone and a combined display mode of FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) (combined). Observer performance levels were assessed and compared with respect to the fraction of correctly identified abnormalities, the number of reported location-specific findings (both true and false), and their associated ratings. The analysis accounts for the number and locations of findings and the location-based ratings using a summary performance index (Λ), which is the FROC analog of the area between the receiver operating characteristic curve and the diagonal (chance) line.
Results: Under the FROC paradigm, each reader detected more true abnormalities associated with cancer, or a higher true-positive fraction, under the combined mode. In an analysis focused on both the number of findings and associated location-based ratings, each of the radiologists performed better under the combined mode compared with FFDM alone, with increases in Λ ranging from 5% to 34%. On average, under the combined mode radiologists achieved a 16% improvement in Λ compared with the FFDM alone mode (95% CI, 7-26%; p < 0.01).
Conclusion: We showed that DBT-based breast imaging in combination with FFDM could result in better performance under the FROC paradigm.
Similar articles
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):586-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2031. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. PMID: 19620460
-
A reader study comparing prospective tomosynthesis interpretations with retrospective readings of the corresponding FFDM examinations.Acad Radiol. 2014 Sep;21(9):1204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.008. Acad Radiol. 2014. PMID: 25107868
-
Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):320-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4656. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21257882
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis in one or two views as a replacement or adjunct technique to full-field digital mammography.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):314-20. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv078. Epub 2015 Apr 5. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015. PMID: 25848107 Review.
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):W172-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3244. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. PMID: 20651178 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1556-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3998-3. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26376882
-
Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Full-Field Digital Mammography in the Diagnostic Setting: Additional Value and Cancer Detectability.J Breast Cancer. 2016 Dec;19(4):438-446. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.438. Epub 2016 Dec 23. J Breast Cancer. 2016. PMID: 28053633 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility.Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 Jan 28;7:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2019.12.001. eCollection 2020. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020. PMID: 33102630 Free PMC article.
-
Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2087-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2831-0. Epub 2013 Apr 26. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23620367
-
Deep learning beyond cats and dogs: recent advances in diagnosing breast cancer with deep neural networks.Br J Radiol. 2018 Sep;91(1089):20170545. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170545. Epub 2018 Apr 10. Br J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29565644 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical