Similar articles

• Evaluation of the reporting validity of central line-associated bloodstream infection data to a provincial surveillance program.

  Fontela PS, Rocher I, Platt RW, Pai M, Buckeridge DL, Frenette C, Dionne M, Quach C. Fontela PS, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;34(2):217-9. doi: 10.1086/669074. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23295575 No abstract available.
• Device use ratio measured weekly can reliably estimate central line-days for central line-associated bloodstream infection rates.

  Shelly MA, Concannon C, Dumyati G. Shelly MA, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;32(7):727-30. doi: 10.1086/660860. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21666408
• Building data quality and confidence in data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network.

  Arnold KE, Thompson ND. Arnold KE, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 May;33(5):446-8. doi: 10.1086/665311. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22476269 No abstract available.
• A cluster of central line-associated bloodstream infections due to rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with hematologic disorders at a Japanese tertiary care center: an outbreak investigation and review of the literature.

  Tagashira Y, Kozai Y, Yamasa H, Sakurada M, Kashiyama T, Honda H. Tagashira Y, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):76-80. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.14. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25627764 Review.
• Preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections outside the intensive care unit: expanding prevention to new settings.

  Kallen AJ, Patel PR, O'Grady NP. Kallen AJ, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 1;51(3):335-41. doi: 10.1086/653942. Clin Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20572762 Review.