Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar;117(3):705-719.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ce2f0.

Long-acting reversible contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant

Affiliations
Review

Long-acting reversible contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant

Eve Espey et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

The provision of effective contraception is fundamental to the practice of women's health care. The most effective methods of reversible contraception are the so-called long-acting reversible contraceptives, intrauterine devices and implants. These methods have multiple advantages over other reversible methods. Most importantly, once in place, they do not require maintenance and their duration of action is long, ranging from 3 to 10 years. Despite the advantages of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, they are infrequently used in the United States. Short-acting methods, specifically oral contraceptives and condoms, are by far the most commonly used reversible methods. A shift from the use of short-acting methods to long-acting reversible contraceptive methods could help reduce the high rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States. In this review of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, we discuss the intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant available in the United States, and we describe candidates for each method, noncontraceptive benefits, and management of complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grimes DA. Forgettable contraception. Contraception 2009;80(6):497–9.
    1. World Health Organization. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Technical report series #753. Geneva: WHO; 1987.
    1. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008, Vital Health Stat 23 2010;1–44.
    1. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2004;70:89–96.
    1. Trussell J, Wynn LL. Reducing unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception 2008;771:1–5.