Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 May;96(5):1258-68.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2865. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

The genetics of bone loss: challenges and prospects

Affiliations
Review

The genetics of bone loss: challenges and prospects

Braxton D Mitchell et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 May.

Abstract

Context: A strong genetic influence on bone mineral density has been long established, and modern genotyping technologies have generated a flurry of new discoveries about the genetic determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) measured at a single time point. However, much less is known about the genetics of age-related bone loss. Identifying bone loss-related genes may provide new routes for therapeutic intervention and osteoporosis prevention.

Evidence acquisition: A review of published peer-reviewed literature on the genetics of bone loss was performed. Relevant studies were summarized, most of which were drawn from the period 1990-2010.

Evidence synthesis: Although bone loss is a challenging phenotype, available evidence supports a substantial genetic contribution. Some of the genes identified from recent genome-wide association studies of cross-sectional BMD are attractive candidate genes for bone loss, most notably genes in the nuclear factor κB and estrogen endocrine pathways. New insights into the biology of skeletal development and regulation of bone turnover have inspired new hypotheses about genetic regulation of bone loss and may provide new directions for identifying genes associated with bone loss.

Conclusions: Although recent genome-wide association and candidate gene studies have begun to identify genes that influence BMD, efforts to identify susceptibility genes specific for bone loss have proceeded more slowly. Nevertheless, clues are beginning to emerge on where to look, and as population studies accumulate, there is hope that important bone loss susceptibility genes will soon be identified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Cross-sectional measures of BMD are influenced by both peak BMD and rate of BMD loss with age.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Comparability of BMD change between individuals depends on age (A) and duration of follow-up (B).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C. 2006. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 32:617–629 - PubMed
    1. Silverman SL. 2005. Quality-of-life issues in osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 7:39–45 - PubMed
    1. Cummings SR, Melton LJ. 2002. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767 - PubMed
    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. 2007. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475 - PubMed
    1. Ralston SH, Uitterlinden AG. 2010. Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 31:629–662 - PubMed

Publication types